Literature DB >> 30522315

Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Jordan A Beim1, Andrew J Oxenham1, Magdalena Wojtczak1.   

Abstract

Attention to a target stimulus within a complex scene often results in enhanced cortical representations of the target relative to the background. It remains unclear where along the auditory pathways attentional effects can first be measured. Anatomy suggests that attentional modulation could occur through corticofugal connections extending as far as the cochlea itself. Earlier attempts to investigate the effects of attention on human cochlear processing have revealed small and inconsistent effects. In this study, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions were recorded from a total of 30 human participants as they performed tasks that required sustained selective attention to auditory or visual stimuli. In the first sample of 15 participants, emission magnitudes were significantly weaker when participants attended to the visual stimuli than when they attended to the auditory stimuli, by an average of 5.4 dB. However, no such effect was found in the second sample of 15 participants. When the data were pooled across samples, the average attentional effect was significant, but small (2.48 dB), with 12 of 30 listeners showing a significant effect, based on bootstrap analysis of the individual data. The results highlight the need for considering sources of individual differences and using large sample sizes in future investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30522315      PMCID: PMC6246073          DOI: 10.1121/1.5079311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  56 in total

1.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in Caucasian and Chinese young adults.

Authors:  Navid Shahnaz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Influence of handedness on peripheral auditory asymmetry.

Authors:  S Khalfa; E Veuillet; L Collet
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 3.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention.

Authors:  T W Picton; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-02

5.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: measurement and data.

Authors:  M J Penner; L Glotzbach; T Huang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Hand preference and age in the United States.

Authors:  A N Gilbert; C J Wysocki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-05

10.  Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Siddharth Rajaram; Lenny A Varghese; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlear activity in silent cue-target intervals shows a theta-rhythmic pattern and is correlated to attentional alpha and theta modulations.

Authors:  Moritz Herbert Albrecht Köhler; Gianpaolo Demarchi; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 7.431

3.  Effect of Auditory Predictability on the Human Peripheral Auditory System.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Irina-Andreea Marianu; Federico De Martino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.