Literature DB >> 22889164

Executive-attentional uncertainty responses by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

J David Smith1, Mariana V C Coutinho, Barbara A Church, Michael J Beran.   

Abstract

The uncertainty response has been influential in studies of human perception, and it is crucial in the growing research literature that explores animal metacognition. However, the uncertainty response's interpretation is still sharply debated. The authors sought to clarify this interpretation using the dissociative technique of cognitive loads imposed on ongoing discrimination performance. Four macaques (Macaca mulatta) performed a sparse-dense discrimination within which an uncertainty response let them decline difficult trials or a middle response let them identify middle stimuli. Concurrent memory tasks were occasionally overlain on ongoing discrimination performance. The concurrent tasks disrupted macaques' uncertainty responses far more than their sparse, middle, or dense discrimination responses. This dissociation suggests that the uncertainty response is a higher level decisional response that is particularly dependent on working memory and attentional resources. This is consistent with the theoretical possibility that the uncertainty response is an elemental behavioral index of uncertainty monitoring or metacognition. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22889164      PMCID: PMC3609932          DOI: 10.1037/a0029601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  49 in total

1.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) immediately generalize the uncertain response.

Authors:  David A Washburn; J David Smith; Wendy E Shields
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-04

2.  Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?

Authors:  Annika Paukner; James R Anderson; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2005-09-24       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?

Authors:  William A Roberts; Miranda C Feeney; Neil McMillan; Krista MacPherson; Evanya Musolino; Mark Petter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

4.  Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task.

Authors:  Frances K Balcomb; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-09

5.  Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

6.  Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Joshua S Redford; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05

7.  Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.

Authors:  Jibo He; Jason S McCarley
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgments.

Authors:  Bennett L Schwartz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01
View more
  28 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Theodore A Evans; Emilie Menzel; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.991

5.  Task switching in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) during computerized categorization tasks.

Authors:  Travis R Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  The interplay between uncertainty monitoring and working memory: Can metacognition become automatic?

Authors:  Mariana V C Coutinho; Joshua S Redford; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Justin J Couchman; J David Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

7.  Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Benjamin M Basile; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Neural networks underlying the metacognitive uncertainty response.

Authors:  Erick J Paul; J David Smith; Vivian V Valentin; Benjamin O Turner; Aron K Barbey; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Simultaneous versus prospective/retrospective uncertainty monitoring: The effect of response competition across cognitive levels.

Authors:  Barbara A Church; Brooke N Jackson; Michael J Beran; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.478

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.