Literature DB >> 29847983

Task switching in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) during computerized categorization tasks.

Travis R Smith1, Michael J Beran1.   

Abstract

The present experiments extended to monkeys a previously used abstract categorization procedure (Castro & Wasserman, 2016) where pigeons had categorized arrays of clipart icons based upon two task rules: the number of clipart objects in the array or the variability of objects in the array. Experiment 1 replicated Castro and Wasserman by using capuchin monkeys and rhesus monkeys and reported that monkeys' performances were similar to pigeons' in terms of acquisition, pattern of errors, and the absence of switch costs. Furthermore, monkeys' insensitivity to the added irrelevant information suggested that an associative (rather than rule-based) categorization mechanism was dominant. Experiment 2 was conducted to include categorization cue reversals to determine (a) whether the monkeys would quickly adapt to the reversals and inhibit interference from a prereversal task rule (consistent with a rule-based mechanism) and (b) whether the latency to make a response prior to a correct or incorrect outcome was informative about the presence of a cognitive mechanism. The cue reassignment produced profound and long-lasting performance deficits, and a long reacquisition phase suggested the involvement of associative learning processes; however, monkeys also displayed longer latencies to choose prior to correct responses on challenging trials, suggesting the involvement of nonassociative processes. Together these performances suggest a mix of associative and cognitive-control processes governing monkey categorization judgments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847983      PMCID: PMC6037543          DOI: 10.1037/xan0000174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  37 in total

1.  Functional MRI of macaque monkeys performing a cognitive set-shifting task.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Nakahara; Toshihiro Hayashi; Seiki Konishi; Yasushi Miyashita
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Task preparation in macaque monkeys ( Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Gijsbert Stoet; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Simon Farrell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

4.  Executive control and task switching in pigeons.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-09-24

5.  A stimulus-location effect in contingency-governed, but not rule-based, discrimination learning.

Authors:  Christina Meier; Stephen E G Lea; Ian P L McLaren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  Task-switching in pigeons: Associative learning or executive control?

Authors:  Christina Meier; Stephen E G Lea; Ian P L McLaren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

Review 8.  Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology.

Authors:  Joel T Nigg
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 8.982

9.  A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  A J Wills; Stephen E G Lea; Lisa A Leaver; Britta Osthaus; Catriona M E Ryan; Mark B Suret; Catherine M L Bryant; Sue J A Chapman; Louise Millar
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-01-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.

Authors:  Ellen M O'Donoghue; Matthew B Broschard; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.478

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.