Literature DB >> 20141317

Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

J David Smith1, Michael J Beran, Matthew J Crossley, Joseph Boomer, F Gregory Ashby.   

Abstract

An influential theoretical perspective differentiates in humans an explicit, rule-based system of category learning from an implicit system that slowly associates different regions of perceptual space with different response outputs. This perspective was extended for the 1st time to the category learning of nonhuman primates. Humans (Homo sapiens) and macaques (Macaca mulatta) learned categories composed of sine-wave gratings that varied across trials in bar width and bar orientation. The categories had either a single-dimensional, rule-based solution or a two-dimensional, information-integration solution. Humans strongly dimensionalized the stimuli and learned the rule-based task far more quickly. Six macaques showed the same performance advantage in the rule-based task. In humans, rule-based category learning is linked to explicit cognition, consciousness, and declarative reports about the contents of cognition. These results demonstrate an empirical continuity between human and nonhuman primate cognition, suggesting that nonhuman primates may have some structural components of humans' capacity for explicit cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20141317      PMCID: PMC2841782          DOI: 10.1037/a0015892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  39 in total

1.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Authors:  E M Waldron; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Studies in discrimination learning by monkeys; discriminations between stimuli differing in both color and form, and only in color, and only in form.

Authors:  H F HARLOW
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1945

3.  Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; J David Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-12

4.  Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon.

Authors:  J Cerella
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.

Authors:  D L Medin; M W Altom; T D Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Response tempo and separable--integral responding: evidence for an integral-to-separable processing sequence in visual perception.

Authors:  T B Ward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Holistic and analytic modes of processing: the multiple determinants of perceptual analysis.

Authors:  C F Foard; D G Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-03

9.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Depression and category learning.

Authors:  J D Smith; J I Tracy; M J Murray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1993-09
View more
  38 in total

1.  Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; F Gregory Ashby; J David Smith; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Jessica L Roeder; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Information-integration category learning and the human uncertainty response.

Authors:  Erick J Paul; Joseph Boomer; J David Smith; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

4.  Development of implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  Cynthia L Huang-Pollock; W Todd Maddox; Sarah L Karalunas
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2011-03-05

5.  Refining the visual-cortical hypothesis in category learning.

Authors:  Mariana V C Coutinho; Justin J Couchman; Joshua S Redford; J David Smith
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Task switching in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) during computerized categorization tasks.

Authors:  Travis R Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  Perceptual dimensions influence auditory category learning.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Rules and resemblance: their changing balance in the category learning of humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Justin J Couchman; Mariana V C Coutinho; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

9.  Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Executive-attentional uncertainty responses by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Mariana V C Coutinho; Barbara A Church; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.