Literature DB >> 24204441

LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS WITH STANDARDIZED MARKERS.

Ying Huang1, Margaret S Pepe, Ziding Feng.   

Abstract

Two different approaches to analysis of data from diagnostic biomarker studies are commonly employed. Logistic regression is used to fit models for probability of disease given marker values while ROC curves and risk distributions are used to evaluate classification performance. In this paper we present a method that simultaneously accomplishes both tasks. The key step is to standardize markers relative to the non-diseased population before including them in the logistic regression model. Among the advantages of this method are: (i) ensuring that results from regression and performance assessments are consistent with each other; (ii) allowing covariate adjustment and covariate effects on ROC curves to be handled in a familiar way, and (iii) providing a mechanism to incorporate important assumptions about structure in the ROC curve into the fitted risk model. We develop the method in detail for the problem of combining biomarker datasets derived from multiple studies, populations or biomarker measurement platforms, when ROC curves are similar across data sources. The methods are applicable to both cohort and case-control sampling designs. The dataset motivating this application concerns Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy where the ROC curves for PCA3 are found to be the same in the two populations. Estimated constrained maximum likelihood and empirical likelihood estimators are derived. The estimators are compared in simulation studies and the methods are illustrated with the PCA3 dataset.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ROC curve; constrained likelihood; empirical likelihood; logistic regression; predictiveness curve

Year:  2013        PMID: 24204441      PMCID: PMC3817965          DOI: 10.1214/13-AOAS634SUPP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  18 in total

1.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 2.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Estimating the diagnostic likelihood ratio of a continuous marker.

Authors:  Wen Gu; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Assessing risk prediction models in case-control studies using semiparametric and nonparametric methods.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Integrating the predictiveness of a marker with its performance as a classifier.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome.

Authors:  Ina L Deras; Sheila M J Aubin; Amy Blase; John R Day; Seongjoon Koo; Alan W Partin; William J Ellis; Leonard S Marks; Yves Fradet; Harry Rittenhouse; Jack Groskopf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: an update.

Authors:  J A Hanley; K O Hajian-Tilaki
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Semiparametric methods for evaluating the covariate-specific predictiveness of continuous markers in matched case-control studies.

Authors:  Y Huang; M S Pepe
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.864

10.  A parametric ROC model-based approach for evaluating the predictiveness of continuous markers in case-control studies.

Authors:  Y Huang; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Key concepts and limitations of statistical methods for evaluating biomarkers of kidney disease.

Authors:  Chirag R Parikh; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Colorectal cancer-associated microbiota contributes to oncogenic epigenetic signatures.

Authors:  Iradj Sobhani; Emma Bergsten; Séverine Couffin; Aurélien Amiot; Biba Nebbad; Caroline Barau; Nicola de'Angelis; Sylvie Rabot; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Denis Mestivier; Thierry Pédron; Khashayarsha Khazaie; Philippe J Sansonetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Pathway and network approaches for identification of cancer signature markers from omics data.

Authors:  Jinlian Wang; Yiming Zuo; Yan-Gao Man; Itzhak Avital; Alexander Stojadinovic; Meng Liu; Xiaowei Yang; Rency S Varghese; Mahlet G Tadesse; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Quantitation of faecal Fusobacterium improves faecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Sunny H Wong; Thomas N Y Kwong; Tai-Cheong Chow; Arthur K C Luk; Rudin Z W Dai; Geicho Nakatsu; Thomas Y T Lam; Lin Zhang; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Simon S M Ng; Martin C S Wong; Siew C Ng; William K K Wu; Jun Yu; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 23.059

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.