Literature DB >> 15180681

The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.

Margaret Sullivan Pepe1, Tianxi Cai.   

Abstract

The idea of using measurements such as biomarkers, clinical data, or molecular biology assays for classification and prediction is popular in modern medicine. The scientific evaluation of such measures includes assessing the accuracy with which they predict the outcome of interest. Receiver operating characteristic curves are commonly used for evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests. They can be applied more broadly, indeed to any problem involving classification to two states or populations (D= 0 or 1). We show that the ROC curve can be interpreted as a cumulative distribution function for the discriminatory measure Y in the affected population (D= 1) after Y has been standardized to the distribution in the reference population (D= 0). The standardized values are called placement values. If the placement values have a uniform(0, 1) distribution, then Y is not discriminatory, because its distribution in the affected population is the same as that in the reference population. The degree to which the distribution of the standardized measure differs from uniform(0, 1) is a natural way to characterize the discriminatory capacity of Y and provides a nontraditional interpretation for the ROC curve. Statistical methods for making inference about distribution functions therefore motivate new approaches to making inference about ROC curves. We demonstrate this by considering the ROC-GLM regression model and observing that it is equivalent to a regression model for the distribution of placement values. The likelihood of the placement values provides a new approach to ROC parameter estimation that appears to be more efficient than previously proposed methods. The method is applied to evaluate a pulmonary function measure in cystic fibrosis patients as a predictor of future occurrence of severe acute pulmonary infection requiring hospitalization. Finally, we note the relationship between regression models for the mean placement value and recently proposed models for the area under the ROC curve which is the classic summary index of discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15180681     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00200.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  Estimating the diagnostic likelihood ratio of a continuous marker.

Authors:  Wen Gu; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS WITH STANDARDIZED MARKERS.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Bayesian nonparametric estimation of targeted agent effects on biomarker change to predict clinical outcome.

Authors:  Rebecca Graziani; Michele Guindani; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Contrasting two frameworks for ROC analysis of ordinal ratings.

Authors:  Daryl E Morris; Margaret Sullivan Pepe; William E Barlow
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation for receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Ileana Montoya Perez; Antti Airola; Peter J Boström; Ivan Jambor; Tapio Pahikkala
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Interethnic differences in the accuracy of anthropometric indicators of obesity in screening for high risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  V M Herrera; J P Casas; J J Miranda; P Perel; R Pichardo; A González; J R Sanchez; C Ferreccio; X Aguilera; E Silva; M Oróstegui; L F Gómez; J A Chirinos; J Medina-Lezama; C M Pérez; E Suárez; A P Ortiz; L Rosero; N Schapochnik; Z Ortiz; D Ferrante; M Diaz; L E Bautista
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  A parametric ROC model-based approach for evaluating the predictiveness of continuous markers in case-control studies.

Authors:  Y Huang; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Semi-parametric maximum likelihood estimates for ROC curves of continuous-scale tests.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Zhou; Huazhen Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.