Literature DB >> 23601953

Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in studies that match controls to cases on covariates.

Margaret Sullivan Pepe1, Jing Fan, Christopher W Seymour.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Studies evaluating a new diagnostic imaging test may select control subjects without disease who are similar to case subjects with disease in regard to factors potentially related to the imaging result. Selecting one or more controls that are matched to each case on factors such as age, comorbidities, or study site improves study validity by eliminating potential biases due to differential characteristics of readings for cases versus controls. However, it is not widely appreciated that valid analysis requires that the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve be adjusted for covariates. We propose a new computationally simple method for estimating the covariate-adjusted ROC curve that is appropriate in matched case-control studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We provide theoretical arguments for the validity of the estimator and demonstrate its application to data. We compare the statistical properties of the estimator with those of a previously proposed estimator of the covariate-adjusted ROC curve. We demonstrate an application of the estimator to data derived from a study of emergency medical services encounters where the goal is to diagnose critical illness in nontrauma, non-cardiac arrest patients. A novel bootstrap method is proposed for calculating confidence intervals.
RESULTS: The new estimator is computationally very simple, yet we show it yields values that approximate the existing, more complicated estimator in simulated data sets. We found that the new estimator has excellent statistical properties, with bias and efficiency comparable with the existing method.
CONCLUSIONS: In matched case-control studies, the ROC curve should be adjusted for matching covariates and can be estimated with the new computationally simple approach.
Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23601953      PMCID: PMC3679266          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  17 in total

1.  Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after pediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Chirag R Parikh; Prasad Devarajan; Michael Zappitelli; Kyaw Sint; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Simon Li; Richard W Kim; Jay L Koyner; Steven G Coca; Charles L Edelstein; Michael G Shlipak; Amit X Garg; Catherine D Krawczeski
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Authors:  William E Barlow; Chen Chi; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Carl D'Orsi; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The importance of ROC data.

Authors:  Frank Samuelson; Brandon D Gallas; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Petrick; Paul Pinsky; Berkman Sahiner; Gregory Campbell; Gene A Pennello
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Biases introduced by choosing controls to match risk factors of cases in biomarker research.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Jing Fan; Christopher W Seymour; Christopher Li; Ying Huang; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.

Authors:  A N Tosteson; C B Begg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

Authors:  David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; Margarita L Zuley; Christiane M Hakim; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Jules H Sumkin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Prediction of critical illness during out-of-hospital emergency care.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Jeremy M Kahn; Colin R Cooke; Timothy R Watkins; Susan R Heckbert; Thomas D Rea
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  P M Bossuyt; J B Reitsma; D E Bruns; C A Gatsonis; P P Glasziou; L M Irwig; J G Lijmer; D Moher; D Rennie; H C W de Vet
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Holly Janes; Patrick M Bossuyt; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  20 in total

1.  Circulating MicroRNAs in Relation to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis and Survival.

Authors:  Jessica L Petrick; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Linda M Liao; Christian C Abnet; Xiaolin Wu; Marilie D Gammon; Thomas L Vaughan; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Incorporating Common Genetic Variants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luke McGeoch; Catherine L Saunders; Simon J Griffin; Jon D Emery; Fiona M Walter; Deborah J Thompson; Antonis C Antoniou; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in matched case control studies.

Authors:  Hui Xu; Jing Qian; Nina P Paynter; Xuehong Zhang; Brian W Whitcomb; Shelley S Tworoger; Kathryn M Rexrode; Susan E Hankinson; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Spatial Correlation and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Cassandra Hathaway; Fabryann Tillman; Robert Weinfurtner; Thomas A Sellers; John Heine
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-05-22

5.  Plasma microRNAs as biomarkers of pancreatic cancer risk in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eric J Duell; Leila Lujan-Barroso; Núria Sala; Samantha Deitz McElyea; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjonneland; Anja Olsen; Elisabete Weiderpass; Lill-Tove Busund; Line Moi; David Muller; Paolo Vineis; Dagfinn Aune; Giuseppe Matullo; Alessio Naccarati; Salvatore Panico; Giovanna Tagliabue; Rosario Tumino; Domenico Palli; Rudolf Kaaks; Verena A Katzke; Heiner Boeing; H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Anastasia Kotanidou; Ruth C Travis; Nick Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Jose Ramon Quiros; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; Miren Dorronsoro; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Gianluca Severi; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Vinciane Rebours; Paul Brennan; Marc Gunter; Ghislaine Scelo; Greg Cote; Stuart Sherman; Murray Korc
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Fall predictors in hospitalized patients living with cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Anita Zeneli; Sandra Montalti; Itria Masciangelo; Gloria Manieri; Monica Golinucci; Oriana Nanni; Maria Teresa Montella; Giovanni Martinelli; Elisabetta Petracci
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.359

7.  CA19-9 and apolipoprotein-A2 isoforms as detection markers for pancreatic cancer: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Kazufumi Honda; Verena A Katzke; Anika Hüsing; Shinobu Okaya; Hirokazu Shoji; Kaoru Onidani; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Kim Overvad; Elisabete Weiderpass; Paolo Vineis; David Muller; Kostas Tsilidis; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Rosario Tumino; Alessio Naccarati; Salvatore Panico; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Heiner Boeing; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nick Wareham; Ruth C Travis; Susana Merino; Eric J Duell; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; María Dolores Chirlaque; Aurelio Barricarte; Vinciane Rebours; Marie-Chiristine Boutron-Ruault; Francesca Romana Mancini; Paul Brennan; Ghislaine Scelo; Jonas Manjer; Malin Sund; Daniel Öhlund; Federico Canzian; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  A prospective and longitudinal study of plasma phospholipid saturated fatty acid profile in relation to cardiometabolic biomarkers and the risk of gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Yeyi Zhu; Michael Y Tsai; Qi Sun; Stefanie N Hinkle; Shristi Rawal; Pauline Mendola; Assiamira Ferrara; Paul S Albert; Cuilin Zhang
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Biomarkers of Chronic Pancreatitis: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; Kristyn Gumpper; Valentina Pita; Phil A Hart; Christopher Forsmark; David C Whitcomb; Dhiraj Yadav; Richard T Waldron; Stephen Pandol; Hanno Steen; Vincent Anani; Natasha Kanwar; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Savi Appana; Liang Li; Jose Serrano; Jo Ann S Rinaudo; Mark Topazian; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.996

10.  A blood-based prognostic liver secretome signature and long-term hepatocellular carcinoma risk in advanced liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Naoto Fujiwara; Masahiro Kobayashi; Austin J Fobar; Ayaka Hoshida; Cesia A Marquez; Bhuvaneswari Koneru; Gayatri Panda; Masataka Taguri; Tongqi Qian; Indu Raman; Quan-Zhen Li; Hiroki Hoshida; Hitomi Sezaki; Hiromitsu Kumada; Ryosuke Tateishi; Takeshi Yokoo; Adam C Yopp; Raymond T Chung; Bryan C Fuchs; Thomas F Baumert; Jorge A Marrero; Neehar D Parikh; Shijia Zhu; Amit G Singal; Yujin Hoshida
Journal:  Med (N Y)       Date:  2021-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.