Literature DB >> 18755739

Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population.

Ying Huang1, Margaret Sullivan Pepe.   

Abstract

The classification accuracy of a continuous marker is typically evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In this paper, we study an alternative conceptual framework, the "percentile value." In this framework, the controls only provide a reference distribution to standardize the marker. The analysis proceeds by analyzing the standardized marker in cases. The approach is shown to be equivalent to ROC analysis. Advantages are that it provides a framework familiar to a broad spectrum of biostatisticians and it opens up avenues for new statistical techniques in biomarker evaluation. We develop several new procedures based on this framework for comparing biomarkers and biomarker performance in different populations. We develop methods that adjust such comparisons for covariates. The methods are illustrated on data from 2 cancer biomarker studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18755739      PMCID: PMC2648906          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  19 in total

1.  A permutation test to compare receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  E S Venkatraman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.

Authors:  Christos Nakas; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Ronald J Bosch; Chronis Moyssiadis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve.

Authors:  D K McClish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: an update.

Authors:  J A Hanley; K O Hajian-Tilaki
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Stratification in nonparametric ROC studies.

Authors:  S Sukhatme; C A Beam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend.

Authors:  J Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  14 in total

1.  Estimating the diagnostic likelihood ratio of a continuous marker.

Authors:  Wen Gu; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Estimating the capacity for improvement in risk prediction with a marker.

Authors:  Wen Gu; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS WITH STANDARDIZED MARKERS.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 4.  Key concepts and limitations of statistical methods for evaluating biomarkers of kidney disease.

Authors:  Chirag R Parikh; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Joint modeling, covariate adjustment, and interaction: contrasting notions in risk prediction models and risk prediction performance.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Predicting developmental delay in a longitudinal cohort of preschool children with single-suture craniosynostosis: is neurobehavioral assessment important?

Authors:  Kristen E Gray; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Jacqueline R Starr; Brent R Collett; Erin R Wallace; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Diagnostic role of procalcitonin in patients with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Jiunn-Yih Wu; Hang-Cheng Chen; Si-Huei Lee; Rai-Chi Chan; Chien-Chang Lee; Shy-Shin Chang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A parametric ROC model-based approach for evaluating the predictiveness of continuous markers in case-control studies.

Authors:  Y Huang; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in studies that match controls to cases on covariates.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Jing Fan; Christopher W Seymour
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Emerging concepts in biomarker discovery; the US-Japan Workshop on Immunological Molecular Markers in Oncology.

Authors:  Hideaki Tahara; Marimo Sato; Magdalena Thurin; Ena Wang; Lisa H Butterfield; Mary L Disis; Bernard A Fox; Peter P Lee; Samir N Khleif; Jon M Wigginton; Stefan Ambs; Yasunori Akutsu; Damien Chaussabel; Yuichiro Doki; Oleg Eremin; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Yoshihiko Hirohashi; Kohzoh Imai; James Jacobson; Masahisa Jinushi; Akira Kanamoto; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Kazunori Kato; Yutaka Kawakami; John M Kirkwood; Thomas O Kleen; Paul V Lehmann; Lance Liotta; Michael T Lotze; Michele Maio; Anatoli Malyguine; Giuseppe Masucci; Hisahiro Matsubara; Shawmarie Mayrand-Chung; Kiminori Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Nishikawa; A Karolina Palucka; Emanuel F Petricoin; Zoltan Pos; Antoni Ribas; Licia Rivoltini; Noriyuki Sato; Hiroshi Shiku; Craig L Slingluff; Howard Streicher; David F Stroncek; Hiroya Takeuchi; Minoru Toyota; Hisashi Wada; Xifeng Wu; Julia Wulfkuhle; Tomonori Yaguchi; Benjamin Zeskind; Yingdong Zhao; Mai-Britt Zocca; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.