Literature DB >> 7529341

A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer.

P H Gann1, C H Hennekens, M J Stampfer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in identifying men who subsequently were or were not clinically diagnosed with prostate cancer, assess optimal test cutoff, measure lead time, and estimate relative risks (RRs) associated with discrete PSA levels. DESIGNS: Nested case-control study of men providing plasma samples before a 10-year follow-up.
SETTING: The Physicians' Health Study, an ongoing randomized trial that enrolled 22,071 men aged 40 to 84 years in 1982. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 366 men (cases) diagnosed with prostate cancer and 1098 men (three controls per case), matched by age, randomly selected from all cohort members at risk at the time of case diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity for each year of follow-up and for aggressive and nonaggressive cancers separately.
RESULTS: At a cutoff of 4.0 ng/mL, sensitivity for the entire 10-year follow-up was 46% for total cases. Sensitivities for detection of total, aggressive, and nonaggressive cancers occurring in the first 4 years were 73%, 87%, and 53%. Overall, specificity was 91% and changed little by year of follow-up. Optimal validity was achieved at a cutoff of 3.3 ng/mL. Estimated mean lead time for all cancers was 5.5 years. Only 40% of cancers detected more than 5 years from baseline were nonaggressive. Compared with men with PSA levels less than 1.0 ng/mL, those with PSA levels between 2.0 and 3.0 ng/mL had an RR of 5.5 (95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 9.2).
CONCLUSIONS: A single PSA measurement had a relatively high sensitivity and specificity for detection of prostate cancers that arose within 4 years. Prostate-specific antigen values less than the usual cutoff were associated with substantial increases in risk compared with the lowest levels. Final evaluation of PSA screening must also consider cost and the ability of current treatments to improve the prognosis of screen-detected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7529341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  108 in total

1.  Segregation analyses of 1,476 population-based Australian families affected by prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Cui; M P Staples; J L Hopper; D R English; M R McCredie; G G Giles
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Miller; M A Diefenbach; L K Kruus; D Watkins-Bruner; G E Hanks; P F Engstrom
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-06

3.  Does PSA screening reduce prostate cancer mortality?

Authors:  André N Vis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Knowledge, attitudes, and screening practices among older men regarding prostate cancer.

Authors:  C B Steele; D S Miller; C Maylahn; R J Uhler; C T Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Calibrating disease progression models using population data: a critical precursor to policy development in cancer control.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Lurdes Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; William Hazelton; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 6.  The role of prostate specific antigen in screening and management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khurshid Guru; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok K Hemal; John Wei; Javid Javidan; James Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Screening without evidence of efficacy.

Authors:  Malcolm Law
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

8.  Prostate cancers in men with low PSA levels--must we find them?

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Artificial neural networks for predictive modeling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduard J Gamito; E David Crawford
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Screening Prostate-specific Antigen Concentration and Prostate Cancer Mortality: The Korean Heart Study.

Authors:  Yejin Mok; Heejin Kimm; Sang Yop Shin; Sun Ha Jee; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.