Literature DB >> 22790392

Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.

Shu-Chen Peng1, Monita Chatterjee, Nelson Lu.   

Abstract

The present article reports on the perceptual weighting of prosodic cues in question-statement identification by adult cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Acoustic analyses of normal-hearing (NH) listeners' production of sentences spoken as questions or statements confirmed that in English the last bisyllabic word in a sentence carries the dominant cues (F0, duration, and intensity patterns) for the contrast. Furthermore, these analyses showed that the F0 contour is the primary cue for the question-statement contrast, with intensity and duration changes conveying important but less reliable information. On the basis of these acoustic findings, the authors examined adult CI listeners' performance in two question-statement identification tasks. In Task 1, 13 CI listeners' question-statement identification accuracy was measured using naturally uttered sentences matched for their syntactic structures. In Task 2, the same listeners' perceptual cue weighting in question-statement identification was assessed using resynthesized single-word stimuli, within which fundamental frequency (F0), intensity, and duration properties were systematically manipulated. Both tasks were also conducted with four NH listeners with full-spectrum and noise-band-vocoded stimuli. Perceptual cue weighting was assessed by comparing the estimated coefficients in logistic models fitted to the data. Of the 13 CI listeners, 7 achieved high performance levels in Task 1. The results of Task 2 indicated that multiple sources of acoustic cues for question-statement identification were utilized to different extents depending on the listening conditions (e.g., full spectrum vs. spectrally degraded) or the listeners' hearing and amplification status (e.g., CI vs. NH).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790392      PMCID: PMC3560417          DOI: 10.1177/1084713812451159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  45 in total

1.  Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yuhjung Tsai; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Charlotte A Smith; Bronwen G Evans
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  Chao-Gang Wei; Keli Cao; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Danielle J Zion; Mickael L Deroche; Brooke A Burianek; Charles J Limb; Alison P Goren; Aditya M Kulkarni; Julie A Christensen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Processing of Acoustic Cues in Lexical-Tone Identification by Pediatric Cochlear-Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; Hui-Ping Lu; Nelson Lu; Yung-Song Lin; Mickael L D Deroche; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The Production of Question Intonation by Young Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Does Age at Implantation Matter?

Authors:  Heike Lehnert-LeHouillier; Linda J Spencer; Elizabeth L Machmer; Kristy L Burchell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Children's Recognition of Emotional Prosody in Spectrally Degraded Speech Is Predicted by Their Age and Cognitive Status.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Danielle J Zion; Aditya M Kulkarni; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.