Literature DB >> 22615415

Evolutionary optimum for male sexual traits characterized using the multivariate Robertson-Price Identity.

Matthieu Delcourt1, Mark W Blows, J David Aguirre, Howard D Rundle.   

Abstract

Phenotypes tend to remain relatively constant in natural populations, suggesting a limit to trait evolution. Although stationary phenotypes suggest stabilizing selection, directional selection is more commonly reported. However, selection on phenotypes will have no evolutionary consequence if the traits do not genetically covary with fitness, a covariance known as the Robertson-Price Identity. The nature of this genetic covariance determines if phenotypes will evolve directionally or whether they reside at an evolutionary optimum. Here, we show how a set of traits can be shown to be under net stabilizing selection through an application of the multivariate Robertson-Price Identity. We characterize how a suite of male sexual displays genetically covaries with fitness in a population of Drosophila serrata. Despite strong directional sexual selection on these phenotypes directly and significant genetic variance in them, little genetic covariance was detected with overall fitness. Instead, genetic analysis of trait deviations showed substantial stabilizing selection on the genetic variance of these traits with respect to overall fitness, indicating that they reside at an evolutionary optimum. In the presence of widespread pleiotropy, stabilizing selection on focal traits will arise through the net effects of selection on other, often unmeasured, traits and will tend to be stronger on trait combinations than single traits. Such selection may be difficult to detect in phenotypic analyses if the environmental covariance between the traits and fitness obscures the underlying genetic associations. The genetic analysis of trait deviations provides a way of detecting the missing stabilizing selection inferred by recent metaanalyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22615415      PMCID: PMC3387100          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116828109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  52 in total

1.  Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D Jennions; A P Møller; M Petrie
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.

Authors:  J S Kotiaho; L W Simmons; J L Tomkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Limits to natural selection.

Authors:  N Barton; L Partridge
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.

Authors:  David Houle; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild.

Authors:  H E Hoekstra; J M Hoekstra; D Berrigan; S N Vignieri; A Hoang; C E Hill; P Beerli; J G Kingsolver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Expression of additive genetic variances and covariances for wild radish floral traits: comparison between field and greenhouse environments.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Conner; Rachael Franks; Christy Stewart
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution.

Authors:  E B Kruuk; Jon Slate; Josephine M Pemberton; Sue Brotherstone; Fiona Guinness; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon; L E Kruuk
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata.

Authors:  Ralph W Howard; Larry L Jackson; Heidi Banse; Mark W Blows
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  10 in total

1.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Heritable Micro-environmental Variance Covaries with Fitness in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sex-dependent expression of behavioural genetic architectures and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; Adam J Reddiex; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Natural and sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons: a quantitative genetic analysis.

Authors:  Jacob D Berson; Marlene Zuk; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Integrating genomics and multivariate evolutionary quantitative genetics: a case study of constraints on sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Adam J Reddiex; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 9.  The Role of Sexual Selection in the Evolution of Chemical Signals in Insects.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger; Johannes Stökl
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  A Paradox of Genetic Variance in Epigamic Traits: Beyond "Good Genes" View of Sexual Selection.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan; Leif Engqvist; Klaus Reinhold
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.119

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.