Literature DB >> 12353761

Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution.

E B Kruuk1, Jon Slate, Josephine M Pemberton, Sue Brotherstone, Fiona Guinness, Tim Clutton-Brock.   

Abstract

We present estimates of the selection on and the heritability of a male secondary sexual weapon in a wild population: antler size in red deer. Male red deer with large antlers had increased lifetime breeding success, both before and after correcting for body size, generating a standardized selection gradient of 0.44 (+/- 0.18 SE). Despite substantial age- and environment-related variation, antler size was also heritable (heritability of antler mass = 0.33 +/- 0.12). However the observed selection did not generate an evolutionary response in antler size over the study period of nearly 30 years, and there was no evidence of a positive genetic correlation between antler size and fitness nor of a positive association between breeding values for antler size and fitness. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that a heritable trait under directional selection will not evolve if associations between the measured trait and fitness are determined by environmental covariances: In red deer males, for example, both antler size and success in the fights for mates may be heavily dependent on an individual's nutritional state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12353761     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01480.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  86 in total

1.  Modularity in the mammalian dentition: mice and monkeys share a common dental genetic architecture.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko; Richard D Sage; Michael C Mahaney
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.656

Review 2.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolution of quantitative traits in the wild: mind the ecology.

Authors:  Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Selection analysis on the rapid evolution of a secondary sexual trait.

Authors:  Swanne P Gordon; David Reznick; Jeff D Arendt; Allen Roughton; Michelle N Ontiveros Hernandez; Paul Bentzen; Andrés López-Sepulcre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Male phenotypic quality influences offspring sex ratio in a polygynous ungulate.

Authors:  Knut H Røed; Øystein Holand; Atle Mysterud; Aage Tverdal; Jouko Kumpula; Mauri Nieminen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Robustness of linkage maps in natural populations: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jon Slate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Maturational costs of reproduction due to clutch size and ontogenetic conflict as revealed in the invisible fraction.

Authors:  Barry Sinervo; Andrew G McAdam
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Sonya M Clegg; John Chittock; Terry Burke; Mark W Blows; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.