Literature DB >> 26384357

Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Katrina McGuigan1, J David Aguirre2, Mark W Blows3.   

Abstract

How new mutations contribute to genetic variation is a key question in biology. Although the evolutionary fate of an allele is largely determined by its heterozygous effect, most estimates of mutational variance and mutational effects derive from highly inbred lines, where new mutations are present in homozygous form. In an attempt to overcome this limitation, middle-class neighborhood (MCN) experiments have been used to assess the fitness effect of new mutations in heterozygous form. However, because MCN populations harbor substantial standing genetic variance, estimates of mutational variance have not typically been available from such experiments. Here we employ a modification of the animal model to analyze data from 22 generations of Drosophila serrata bred in an MCN design. Mutational heritability, measured for eight cuticular hydrocarbons, 10 wing-shape traits, and wing size in this outbred genetic background, ranged from 0.0006 to 0.006 (with one exception), a similar range to that reported from studies employing inbred lines. Simultaneously partitioning the additive and mutational variance in the same outbred population allowed us to quantitatively test the ability of mutation-selection balance models to explain the observed levels of additive and mutational genetic variance. The Gaussian allelic approximation and house-of-cards models, which assume real stabilizing selection on single traits, both overestimated the genetic variance maintained at equilibrium, but the house-of-cards model was a closer fit to the data. This analytical approach has the potential to be broadly applied, expanding our understanding of the dynamics of genetic variance in natural populations.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal model; heterozygous; middle-class neighborhood; mutation-selection balance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26384357      PMCID: PMC4649648          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.178632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  55 in total

1.  Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Stephen F Chenoweth; Emma Hine
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Denis Réale; Michelle N Clements; Michael M Morrissey; Erik Postma; Craig A Walling; Loeske E B Kruuk; Daniel H Nussey
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Roff; T A Mousseau
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Age-specific effects of novel mutations in Drosophila melanogaster I. Mortality.

Authors:  L E Pearse; D E Promislow
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?

Authors:  Megan Higgie; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids.

Authors:  M W Blows; R A Allan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Joint allelic effects on fitness and metric traits.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance.

Authors:  Herman A Mulder; Sang Hong Lee; Sam Clark; Ben J Hayes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Accounting for Sampling Error in Genetic Eigenvalues Using Random Matrix Theory.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mutation Is a Sufficient and Robust Predictor of Genetic Variation for Mitotic Spindle Traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Reza Farhadifar; José Miguel Ponciano; Erik C Andersen; Daniel J Needleman; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The contribution of mutation and selection to multivariate quantitative genetic variance in an outbred population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Robert J Dugand; J David Aguirre; Emma Hine; Mark W Blows; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The "New Synthesis".

Authors:  Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Ecological factors influence balancing selection on leaf chemical profiles of a wildflower.

Authors:  Lauren N Carley; Julius P Mojica; Baosheng Wang; Chia-Yu Chen; Ya-Ping Lin; Kasavajhala V S K Prasad; Emily Chan; Che-Wei Hsu; Rose Keith; Chase L Nuñez; Carrie F Olson-Manning; Catherine A Rushworth; Maggie R Wagner; Jing Wang; Pei-Min Yeh; Michael Reichelt; Kathryn Ghattas; Jonathan Gershenzon; Cheng-Ruei Lee; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 15.460

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.