Literature DB >> 34641732

Integrating genomics and multivariate evolutionary quantitative genetics: a case study of constraints on sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.

Adam J Reddiex1,2, Stephen F Chenoweth1.   

Abstract

In evolutionary quantitative genetics, the genetic variance-covariance matrix, G, and the vector of directional selection gradients, β, are key parameters for predicting multivariate selection responses and genetic constraints. Historically, investigations of G and β have not overlapped with those dissecting the genetic basis of quantitative traits. Thus, it remains unknown whether these parameters reflect pleiotropic effects at individual loci. Here, we integrate multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) with G and β estimation in a well-studied system of multivariate constraint: sexual selection on male cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in Drosophila serrata. In a panel of wild-derived re-sequenced lines, we augment genome-based restricted maximum likelihood to estimate G alongside multivariate single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects, detecting 532 significant associations from 1 652 276 SNPs. Constraint was evident, with β lying in a direction of G with low evolvability. Interestingly, minor frequency alleles typically increased male CHC-attractiveness suggesting opposing natural selection on β. SNP effects were significantly misaligned with the major eigenvector of G, gmax, but well aligned to the second and third eigenvectors g2 and g3. We discuss potential factors leading to these varied results including multivariate stabilizing selection and mutational bias. Our framework may be useful as researchers increasingly access genomic methods to study multivariate selection responses in wild populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lande equation; genomics; multitrait GWAS; multivariate quantitative genetics; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34641732      PMCID: PMC8511789          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  63 in total

1.  Evolution of multicomponent pheromone signals in small ermine moths involves a single fatty-acyl reductase gene.

Authors:  Marjorie A Liénard; Asa K Hagström; Jean-Marc Lassance; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Jian Yang; S Hong Lee; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Spontaneous mutational correlations for life-history, morphological and behavioral characters in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Beverly C Ajie; Michael Lynch; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effects of migration on the genetic covariance matrix.

Authors:  Frédéric Guillaume; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  What affects the predictability of evolutionary constraints using a G-matrix? The relative effects of modular pleiotropy and mutational correlation.

Authors:  Jobran Chebib; Frédéric Guillaume
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study of Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  William Pitchers; Jessica Nye; Eladio J Márquez; Alycia Kowalski; Ian Dworkin; David Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger; Paul A Hohenlohe; Beverley C Ajie; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Noah A Zaitlen; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.