Literature DB >> 28642270

Heritable Micro-environmental Variance Covaries with Fitness in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Jacqueline L Sztepanacz1, Katrina McGuigan2, Mark W Blows2.   

Abstract

The genetic basis of stochastic variation within a defined environment, and the consequences of such micro-environmental variance for fitness are poorly understood . Using a multigenerational breeding design in Drosophila serrata, we demonstrated that the micro-environmental variance in a set of morphological wing traits in a randomly mating population had significant additive genetic variance in most single wing traits. Although heritability was generally low (<1%), coefficients of additive genetic variance were of a magnitude typical of other morphological traits, indicating that the micro-environmental variance is an evolvable trait. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the micro-environmental variance in wings was genetically correlated among single traits, indicating that common mechanisms of environmental buffering exist for this functionally related set of traits. In addition, through the dominance genetic covariance between the major axes of micro-environmental variance and fitness, we demonstrated that micro-environmental variance shares a genetic basis with fitness, and that the pattern of selection is suggestive of variance-reducing selection acting on micro-environmental variance.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  canalization; dominance; fitness; micro-environmental variance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28642270      PMCID: PMC5560815          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.199075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  77 in total

1.  Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Stephen F Chenoweth; Emma Hine
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Artificial selection reveals heritable variation for developmental instability.

Authors:  Ashley J R Carter; David Houle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; William G Hill
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genetic variation and quantitative trait loci associated with developmental stability and the environmental correlation between traits in maize.

Authors:  Bernardo Ordas; Rosa A Malvar; William G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Stabilizing and disruptive selection on a mutant character in Drosophila. I. The phenotypic variance and its components.

Authors:  W Scharloo; M S Hoogmoed; A T Kuile
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Lack of response to artificial selection on developmental stability of partial wing shape components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Masahiro Tsujino; Kazuo H Takahashi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Left-right asymmetry of fly wings and the evolution of body axes.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; G S McIntyre; S D Zaklan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape.

Authors:  Casper J Breuker; James S Patterson; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  The Origin of Additive Genetic Variance Driven by Positive Selection.

Authors:  Li Liu; Yayu Wang; Di Zhang; Zhuoxin Chen; Xiaoshu Chen; Zhijian Su; Xionglei He
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.