Literature DB >> 11470913

Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild.

H E Hoekstra1, J M Hoekstra, D Berrigan, S N Vignieri, A Hoang, C E Hill, P Beerli, J G Kingsolver.   

Abstract

Directional selection is a major force driving adaptation and evolutionary change. However, the distribution, strength, and tempo of phenotypic selection acting on quantitative traits in natural populations remain unclear across different study systems. We reviewed the literature (1984-1997) that reported the strength of directional selection as indexed by standardized linear selection gradients (beta). We asked how strong are viability and sexual selection, and whether strength of selection is correlated with the time scale over which it was measured. Estimates of the magnitude of directional selection (absolute value of beta) were exponentially distributed, with few estimates greater than 0.50 and most estimates less than 0.15. Sexual selection (measured by mating success) appeared stronger than viability selection (measured by survival). Viability selection that was measured over short periods (days) was typically stronger than selection measured over longer periods (months and years), but the strength of sexual selection did not vary with duration of selection episodes; as a result, sexual selection was stronger than viability selection over longer time scales (months and years), but not over short time scales (days).

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470913      PMCID: PMC55389          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161281098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations.

Authors:  J G Kingsolver; H E Hoekstra; J M Hoekstra; D Berrigan; S N Vignieri; C E Hill; A Hoang; P Gibert; P Beerli
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Viability versus Fecundity Selection in the Slender Wild Oat, Avena barbata L.

Authors:  M T Clegg; R W Allard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Intense Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches (Geospizinae) in the Galapagos.

Authors:  P T Boag; P R Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  G Arnqvist; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Rapid evolution as an ecological process.

Authors:  J N Thompson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  PERSPECTIVE: THE PACE OF MODERN LIFE: MEASURING RATES OF CONTEMPORARY MICROEVOLUTION.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry; Michael T Kinnison
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  PREDICTING MICROEVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION ON HERITABLE VARIATION.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  73 in total

1.  Selection on insect immunity in the wild.

Authors:  Jens Rolff; Michael T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Thirty-four years of climatic selection in the land snail Theba pisana.

Authors:  M S Johnson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Natural selection and the genetics of adaptation in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter; Kerry B Marchinko; R D H Barrett; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Jeffrey A Evans; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Predation selects for increased immune function in male damselflies, Calopteryx splendens.

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Johanna Honkavaara; Derek W Dunn; Jukka Suhonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.

Authors:  Emily S Martin; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Rapid courtship evolution in grouse (Tetraonidae): contrasting patterns of acceleration between the Eurasian and North American polygynous clades.

Authors:  Allen Spaulding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Fine-scale geographic patterns of gene flow and reproductive character displacement in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Emily R Bewick; Brooke E White; Michael J Bray; Devon P Humphreys
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Reconstructing the history of selection during homoploid hybrid speciation.

Authors:  Sophie Karrenberg; Christian Lexer; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.