Literature DB >> 11976682

Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution.

Patricia Beldade1, Kees Koops, Paul M Brakefield.   

Abstract

Evolutionary developmental biology has encouraged a change of research emphasis from the sorting of phenotypic variation by natural selection to the production of that variation through development. Some morphologies are more readily generated than others, and developmental mechanisms can limit or channel evolutionary change. Such biases determine how readily populations are able to respond to selection, and have been postulated to explain stasis in morphological evolution and unexplored morphologies. There has been much discussion about evolutionary constraints but empirical data testing them directly are sparse. The spectacular diversity in butterfly wing patterns is suggestive of how little constrained morphological evolution can be. However, for wing patterns involving serial repeats of the same element, developmental properties suggest that some directions of evolutionary change might be restricted. Here we show that despite the developmental coupling between different eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana, there is great potential for independent changes. This flexibility is consistent with the diversity of wing patterns across species and argues for a dominant role of natural selection, rather than internal constraints, in shaping existing variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11976682     DOI: 10.1038/416844a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  62 in total

1.  Modularity in the mammalian dentition: mice and monkeys share a common dental genetic architecture.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko; Richard D Sage; Michael C Mahaney
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic basis of stage-specific melanism: a putative role for a cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase in insect pigmentation.

Authors:  S V Saenko; M A Jerónimo; P Beldade
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Evolution of functional specialization and division of labor.

Authors:  Claus Rueffler; Joachim Hermisson; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  On the origins of sexual dimorphism in butterflies.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Oliver; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland; Tobias Uller; Marcus W Feldman; Kim Sterelny; Gerd B Müller; Armin Moczek; Eva Jablonka; John Odling-Smee
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Bas J Zwaan; David L Stern; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Female butterflies prefer males bearing bright iridescent ornamentation.

Authors:  Darrell J Kemp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Microarray analysis of replicate populations selected against a wing-shape correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kenneth E Weber; Ralph J Greenspan; David R Chicoine; Katia Fiorentino; Mary H Thomas; Theresa L Knight
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.