| Literature DB >> 22606935 |
Sabrina H Spiezio1, Toyoyuki Takada, Toshihiko Shiroishi, Joseph H Nadeau.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The genetic architecture of complex traits strongly influences the consequences of inherited mutations, genetic engineering, environmental and genetic perturbations, and natural and artificial selection. But because most studies are under-powered, the picture of complex traits is often incomplete. Chromosome substitution strains (CSSs) are a unique paradigm for these genome surveys because they enable statistically independent, powerful tests for the phenotypic effects of each chromosome on a uniform inbred genetic background. A previous CSS survey in mice and rats revealed many complex trait genes (QTLs), large phenotypic effects, extensive epistasis, as well as systems properties such as strongly directional phenotypic changes and genetically-determined limits on the range of phenotypic variation. However, the unusually close genetic relation between the CSS progenitor strains in that study raised questions about the impact of genetic divergence: would greater divergence between progenitor strains, with the corresponding changes in gene regulation and protein function, lead to significantly more distinctive phenotypic features, or alternatively would epistasis and systems constraints, which are pervasive in CSSs, limit the range of phenotypic variation regardless of the extent of DNA sequence variation?Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22606935 PMCID: PMC3406986 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
QTL summary for the three CSS panels
| A/J | 90 | 62% (55) | 10% (9) | 12% (11) | 16% (14) | 437 |
| PWD | 76 | 49% (37) | 30% (37) | 16% (12) | 5% (4) | 203 |
| MSM | 71 | 55% (39) | 11% (8) | 25% (18) | 8% (6) | 283 |
For each trait, ‘multigenic’ means at least three CSSs differed significantly from the C57BL/6J host strain, and ‘digenic’ and ‘monogenic’ means two CSSs or only one CSS respectively differed significantly from the host strain, and ‘no QTL’ means no CSSs differed significantly from the host strain. ‘No. of multigenic QTLs’ is the sum of the CSSs with significant effects for all multigenic traits in each CSS panel, assuming that each significant CSS represents at least one QTL on the substituted chromosome.
QTL number and average phenotypic effect for multigenic traits in the three CSS panels
| A/J | 41 | 8.0 (3,16) | 75.9 (24.4, 148.4) |
| PWD | 22 | 5.5 (3,13) | 153.0 (29.0, 408.6) |
| MSM | 22 | 7.2 (3,15) | 47.4 (16.6, 148.4) |
Ave – average (Min – minimum, Max – maximum). These results apply to traits that showed significant differences for at least three CSSs, and that also differed significantly between the parental strains. The NormUnit method was used to calculate phenotypic effect; the Hi_Low method yielded similar results (not shown).
Percentage of traits showing non-additive effects (epistasis) and the cumulative phenotypic effects for CSSs with significant effects, non-significant effects, and all CSSs combined
| % traits showing epistasis | Med % (min,max) | % traits showing epistasis | Med % (min,max) | % traits showing epistasis | Med % (min,max) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A/J | 41 | 95 | 605.5 (41.0, 1205.8) | 56 | 168.3 (0.8, 643.4) | 98 | 790.3 (6.5, 1397.2) |
| PWD | 22 | 82 | 404.0 (16.8, 3176.9) | 77 | 250.1 (51.4, 1182.5) | 86 | 751.8 (53.2, 3630.8) |
| MSM | 22 | 91 | 247.3 (90.7, 1073.7) | 50 | 166.4 (0.3, 523.0) | 100 | 371.7 (156.2, 1589.4) |
Med – median (min – minimum, max – maximum).
Figure 1Cumulative action of combined, significant and non-significant CSS effects for multigenic traits. For each trait that differed significantly between the parental strains, we calculated the cumulative signed phenotypic effect (summed across the CSSs) and the corresponding SEM. The absolute value of the cumulative phenotypic effect is shown in rank order for each trait. For additive effects, the cumulative phenotypic effect should approach ~100% (dashed horizontal line at 100%). Traits were termed ‘epistatic’ (indicated in red) if the cumulative phenotypic effect exceeded 100% by more than the SEM. The analysis was repeated for only those CSSs whose phenotypic difference from the host strain that achieved statistical significance, those that fell short of statistical significance, and all CSSs combined. A. PWD, and B. MSM
Directionality for multigenic traits where the parental strains differed significantly
| A/J | 342 | 7.3% (25) | 92.7% (317) | 1.8% (6) |
| PWD | 122 | 31.3% (38) | 68.9% (84) | 12.3% (15) |
| MSM | 168 | 11.9% (20) | 88.1% (148) | 0% (0) |
“Towards donor” and “away from” means that a CSS shifted towards or away from the phenotype of the donor strain. “More extreme than donor” means that a CSS not only shifted the phenotype towards but also significantly beyond phenotype of the donor strain. Number of QTLs is provided in parentheses. The analysis was restricted to multigenic traits where the parental strains also differed significantly.
Figure 2Frequency distribution of phenotypic effects in two CSS panels. For traits that differed significantly between the parental strains, phenotypic effects for CSSs that differed significantly from the C57BL/6J host strain are indicated in red, and those that did not differ significantly from B6 are indicated in blue. Phenotypes were normalized so that C57BL/6J = 0% and A/J = 100%. A. PWD CSS panel. B. MSM CSS panel
Features of genetic architecture and systems properties in the three CSS panels
| A/J | 62% | 8.0 | 75.9 | 98% | 790.3% | 7.3% |
| PWD | 49% | 5.6 | 152.91 | 86% | 751.8% | 31.3%3 |
| MSM | 57% | 7.7 | 47.22 | 100% | 412.0% | 11.9% |
Each of the three CSS panels was compared to the C57BL/6J host strain. Various features of genetic and systems architecture of complex traits were compared for the two CSS contrasts, namely CSSPWD vs CSSA/J and CSSMSM vs CSSA/J. Statistical tests were applied to average phenotypic effect (%), percentage of traits showing epistasis, median cumulative effect, and phenotypic shift ‘away from donor’ strain, but were not used for percentage of traits that are multigenic and average number of QTLs per trait, because both the PWD and MSM panels are incomplete (missing CSSs).
1 t-test: P < 10.-20
2 t-test: P < 10.-16
3 χ2 contingency test: P < 0.001.