Literature DB >> 24296533

Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions.

Trudy F C Mackay1.   

Abstract

The role of epistasis in the genetic architecture of quantitative traits is controversial, despite the biological plausibility that nonlinear molecular interactions underpin the genotype-phenotype map. This controversy arises because most genetic variation for quantitative traits is additive. However, additive variance is consistent with pervasive epistasis. In this Review, I discuss experimental designs to detect the contribution of epistasis to quantitative trait phenotypes in model organisms. These studies indicate that epistasis is common, and that additivity can be an emergent property of underlying genetic interaction networks. Epistasis causes hidden quantitative genetic variation in natural populations and could be responsible for the small additive effects, missing heritability and the lack of replication that are typically observed for human complex traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24296533      PMCID: PMC3918431          DOI: 10.1038/nrg3627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  96 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci mapped to single-nucleotide resolution in yeast.

Authors:  Adam M Deutschbauer; Ronald W Davis
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice.

Authors:  William Valdar; Leah C Solberg; Dominique Gauguier; Stephanie Burnett; Paul Klenerman; William O Cookson; Martin S Taylor; J Nicholas P Rawlins; Richard Mott; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-09       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions.

Authors:  Robert P St Onge; Ramamurthy Mani; Julia Oh; Michael Proctor; Eula Fung; Ronald W Davis; Corey Nislow; Frederick P Roth; Guri Giaever
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Epistasis and the release of genetic variation during long-term selection.

Authors:  Orjan Carlborg; Lina Jacobsson; Per Ahgren; Paul Siegel; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance.

Authors:  J Doebley; A Stec; C Gustus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mapping genetic loci that interact with myostatin to affect growth traits.

Authors:  Y Cheng; S Rachagani; J C M Dekkers; M S Mayes; R Tait; J M Reecy
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Epistasis affecting litter size in mice.

Authors:  A C Peripato; R A De Brito; S R Matioli; L S Pletscher; T T Vaughn; J M Cheverud
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Both additivity and epistasis control the genetic variation for fruit quality traits in tomato.

Authors:  Mathilde Causse; Jamila Chaïb; Laurent Lecomte; Michel Buret; Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 5.574

9.  Genomic value prediction for quantitative traits under the epistatic model.

Authors:  Zhiqiu Hu; Yongguang Li; Xiaohui Song; Yingpeng Han; Xiaodong Cai; Shizhong Xu; Wenbin Li
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Linking metabolic QTLs with network and cis-eQTLs controlling biosynthetic pathways.

Authors:  Adam M Wentzell; Heather C Rowe; Bjarne Gram Hansen; Carla Ticconi; Barbara Ann Halkier; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  301 in total

1.  Misspecification in Mixed-Model-Based Association Analysis.

Authors:  Willem Kruijer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Natural Variation of Plant Metabolism: Genetic Mechanisms, Interpretive Caveats, and Evolutionary and Mechanistic Insights.

Authors:  Nicole E Soltis; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Reassess the t Test: Interact with All Your Data via ANOVA.

Authors:  Siobhan M Brady; Meike Burow; Wolfgang Busch; Örjan Carlborg; Katherine J Denby; Jane Glazebrook; Eric S Hamilton; Stacey L Harmer; Elizabeth S Haswell; Julin N Maloof; Nathan M Springer; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Authors:  J-M Bouvet; G Makouanzi; D Cros; Ph Vigneron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Valentin Wimmer; Malena Erbe; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 7.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  Personalized Therapy of Hypertension: the Past and the Future.

Authors:  Paolo Manunta; Mara Ferrandi; Daniele Cusi; Patrizia Ferrari; Jan Staessen; Giuseppe Bianchi
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Evidence for epistatic interaction between VDR and SLC13A2 genes in the pathogenesis of hypocitraturia in recurrent calcium oxalate stone formers.

Authors:  Domenico Rendina; Gianpaolo De Filippo; Fernando Gianfrancesco; Riccardo Muscariello; Michele Schiano di Cola; Pasquale Strazzullo; Teresa Esposito
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 3.902

10.  Analysis of Polygenic Mutants Suggests a Role for Mediator in Regulating Transcriptional Activation Distance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Caitlin T Reavey; Mark J Hickman; Krista C Dobi; David Botstein; Fred Winston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.