Literature DB >> 22961226

Chromosome substitution strains: gene discovery, functional analysis, and systems studies.

Joseph H Nadeau1, Jiri Forejt, Toyoyuki Takada, Toshihiko Shiroishi.   

Abstract

Laboratory mice are valuable in biomedical research in part because of the extraordinary diversity of genetic resources that are available for studies of complex genetic traits and as models for human biology and disease. Chromosome substitution strains (CSSs) are important in this resource portfolio because of their demonstrated use for gene discovery, genetic and epigenetic studies, functional characterizations, and systems analysis. CSSs are made by replacing a single chromosome in a host strain with the corresponding chromosome from a donor strain. A complete CSS panel involves a total of 22 engineered inbred strains, one for each of the 19 autosomes, one each for the X and Y chromosomes, and one for mitochondria. A genome survey simply involves comparing each phenotype for each of the CSSs with the phenotypes of the host strain. The CSS panels that are available for laboratory mice have been used to dissect a remarkable variety of phenotypes and to characterize an impressive array of disease models. These surveys have revealed considerable phenotypic diversity even among closely related progenitor strains, evidence for strong epistasis and for heritable epigenetic changes. Perhaps most importantly, and presumably because of their unique genetic constitution, CSSs, and congenic strains derived from them, the genetic variants underlying quantitative trait loci (QTLs) are readily identified and functionally characterized. Together these studies show that CSSs are important resource for laboratory mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22961226      PMCID: PMC3917716          DOI: 10.1007/s00335-012-9426-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  125 in total

1.  Chromosome substitution strains: some quantitative considerations for genome scans and fine mapping.

Authors:  John K Belknap
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Finding genes that underlie complex traits.

Authors:  Anne M Glazier; Joseph H Nadeau; Timothy J Aitman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Can the partial deletion in the Y chromosome of male mice affect the reproductive efficiency of their daughters?

Authors:  Katarzyna Kotarska; Jozefa Styrna
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals.

Authors:  Benjamin R Carone; Lucas Fauquier; Naomi Habib; Jeremy M Shea; Caroline E Hart; Ruowang Li; Christoph Bock; Chengjian Li; Hongcang Gu; Phillip D Zamore; Alexander Meissner; Zhiping Weng; Hans A Hofmann; Nir Friedman; Oliver J Rando
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Higher differentiation among subspecies of the house mouse (Mus musculus) in genomic regions with low recombination.

Authors:  A Geraldes; P Basset; K L Smith; M W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  A major QTL on chromosome 11 influences psychostimulant and opioid sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  C D Bryant; H P Chang; J Zhang; T Wiltshire; L M Tarantino; A A Palmer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  The AXB and BXA set of recombinant inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J D Marshall; J L Mu; Y C Cheah; M N Nesbitt; W N Frankel; B Paigen
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Mouse inter-subspecific consomic strains for genetic dissection of quantitative complex traits.

Authors:  Toyoyuki Takada; Akihiko Mita; Akiteru Maeno; Takahiro Sakai; Hiroshi Shitara; Yoshiaki Kikkawa; Kazuo Moriwaki; Hiromichi Yonekawa; Toshihiko Shiroishi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Life in the fast lane: mammalian disease models in the genomics era.

Authors:  Lukas E Dow; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Chromosome Y variants from different inbred mouse strains are linked to differences in the morphologic and molecular responses of cardiac cells to postpubertal testosterone.

Authors:  Bastien Llamas; Ricardo A Verdugo; Gary A Churchill; Christian F Deschepper
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Mouse Systems Genetics as a Prelude to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Hao Li; Johan Auwerx
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Genetic control of obesity, glucose homeostasis, dyslipidemia and fatty liver in a mouse model of diet-induced metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  D S Sinasac; J D Riordan; S H Spiezio; B S Yandell; C M Croniger; J H Nadeau
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Mechanistic basis of infertility of mouse intersubspecific hybrids.

Authors:  Tanmoy Bhattacharyya; Sona Gregorova; Ondrej Mihola; Martin Anger; Jaroslava Sebestova; Paul Denny; Petr Simecek; Jiri Forejt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Meeting report of the European mouse complex genetics network SYSGENET.

Authors:  Anna Delprato; Ana M Aransay; Heike Kollmus; Klaus Schughart; Juan M Falcon-Perez
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Insights into obesity and diabetes at the intersection of mouse and human genetics.

Authors:  Melkam A Kebede; Alan D Attie
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 12.015

6.  Genetic determinants of atherosclerosis, obesity, and energy balance in consomic mice.

Authors:  Sabrina H Spiezio; Lynn M Amon; Timothy S McMillen; Cynthia M Vick; Barbara A Houston; Mark Caldwell; Kayoko Ogimoto; Gregory J Morton; Elizabeth A Kirk; Michael W Schwartz; Joseph H Nadeau; Renée C LeBoeuf
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Fine mapping of the Bmgr5 quantitative trait locus for allogeneic bone marrow engraftment in mice.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Xinjian Chen; Schickwann Tsai; Alun Thomas; Judith A Shizuru; Thai M Cao
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 8.  Contrasting genetic architectures in different mouse reference populations used for studying complex traits.

Authors:  David A Buchner; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  The Y chromosome as a regulatory element shaping immune cell transcriptomes and susceptibility to autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Laure K Case; Emma H Wall; Julie A Dragon; Naresha Saligrama; Dimitry N Krementsov; Mohamad Moussawi; James F Zachary; Sally A Huber; Elizabeth P Blankenhorn; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Copy number variation in Y chromosome multicopy genes is linked to a paternal parent-of-origin effect on CNS autoimmune disease in female offspring.

Authors:  Laure K Case; Emma H Wall; Erin E Osmanski; Julie A Dragon; Naresha Saligrama; James F Zachary; Bernardo Lemos; Elizabeth P Blankenhorn; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.