Literature DB >> 22579527

Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment.

Bin Zheng1, Jules H Sumkin, Margarita L Zuley, Xingwei Wang, Amy H Klym, David Gur.   

Abstract

To improve efficacy of breast cancer screening and prevention programs, it requires a risk assessment model with high discriminatory power. This study aimed to assess classification performance of using computed bilateral mammographic density asymmetry to predict risk of individual women developing breast cancer in near-term. The database includes 451 cases with multiple screening mammography examinations. The first (baseline) examinations of all case were interpreted negative. In the next sequential examinations, 187 cases developed cancer or surgically excised high-risk lesions, 155 remained negative (not-recalled), and 109 were recalled benign cases. From each of two bilateral cranio-caudal view images acquired from the baseline examination, we computed two features of average pixel value and local pixel value fluctuation. We then computed mean and difference of each feature computed from two images. When applying the computed features and other two risk factors (woman's age and subjectively rated mammographic density) to predict risk of cancer development, areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were computed to evaluate the discriminatory/classification performance. The AUCs are 0.633±0.030, 0.535±0.036, 0.567±0.031, and 0.719±0.027 when using woman's age, subjectively rated, computed mean and asymmetry of mammographic density, to classify between two groups of cancer-verified and negative cases, respectively. When using an equal-weighted fusion method to combine woman's age and computed density asymmetry, AUC increased to 0.761±0.025 (p<0.05). The study demonstrated that bilateral mammographic density asymmetry could be a significantly stronger risk factor associated to the risk of women developing breast cancer in near-term than woman's age and assessed mean mammographic density.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22579527      PMCID: PMC3430819          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  34 in total

1.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Authors:  W A Berg; C Campassi; P Langenberg; M J Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Computerized assessment of tissue composition on digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Yuan-Hsiang Chang; Xiao-Hui Wang; Lara A Hardesty; Thomas S Chang; William R Poller; Walter F Good; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography.

Authors:  R G Blanks; M G Wallis; R M Given-Wilson
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors.

Authors:  M P Madigan; R G Ziegler; J Benichou; C Byrne; R N Hoover
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The relationship between breast asymmetry, breast size and the occurrence of breast cancer.

Authors:  D Scutt; J T Manning; G H Whitehouse; S J Leinster; C P Massey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; R N Hoover; L A Brinton; M Szklo; D R Olson; M Salane; J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.

Authors:  Edward A Sickles; Dulcy E Wolverton; Katherine E Dee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience.

Authors:  S Ciatto; M Zappa
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  26 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI images using bilateral asymmetry of contrast enhancement between two breasts.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Chengjie Zhang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Breast tissue stiffness estimation for surgical guidance using gravity-induced excitation.

Authors:  Rebekah H Griesenauer; Jared A Weis; Lori R Arlinghaus; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Left-right analysis of mammary gland development in retinoid X receptor-α+/- mice.

Authors:  Jacqulyne P Robichaux; John W Fuseler; Shrusti S Patel; Steven W Kubalak; Adam Hartstone-Rose; Ann F Ramsdell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Samuel Cheng; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Abolfazl Zargari Khuzani; Alan B Hollingsworth; Gopichandh Danala; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Yuchen Qiu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Assessment of global and local region-based bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry to predict short-term breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Yane Li; Ming Fan; Hu Cheng; Peng Zhang; Bin Zheng; Lihua Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Applying a new quantitative global breast MRI feature analysis scheme to assess tumor response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Faranak Aghaei; Maxine Tan; Alan B Hollingsworth; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Shiju Yan; Yunzhi Wang; Faranak Aghaei; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Tamara Miner Haygood; Julie Cooper; Anne-Marie Culpan; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.