Literature DB >> 27573841

A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast.

Karla K Evans1, Tamara Miner Haygood2, Julie Cooper3, Anne-Marie Culpan4, Jeremy M Wolfe5.   

Abstract

Humans are very adept at extracting the "gist" of a scene in a fraction of a second. We have found that radiologists can discriminate normal from abnormal mammograms at above-chance levels after a half-second viewing (d' ∼ 1) but are at chance in localizing the abnormality. This pattern of results suggests that they are detecting a global signal of abnormality. What are the stimulus properties that might support this ability? We investigated the nature of the gist signal in four experiments by asking radiologists to make detection and localization responses about briefly presented mammograms in which the spatial frequency, symmetry, and/or size of the images was manipulated. We show that the signal is stronger in the higher spatial frequencies. Performance does not depend on detection of breaks in the normal symmetry of left and right breasts. Moreover, above-chance classification is possible using images from the normal breast of a patient with overt signs of cancer only in the other breast. Some signal is present in the portions of the parenchyma (breast tissue) that do not contain a lesion or that are in the contralateral breast. This signal does not appear to be a simple assessment of breast density but rather the detection of the abnormal gist may be based on a widely distributed image statistic, learned by experts. The finding that a global signal, related to disease, can be detected in parenchyma that does not contain a lesion has implications for improving breast cancer detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; gist processing; mammography; medical image perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27573841      PMCID: PMC5027466          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606187113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

2.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention.

Authors:  Fei Fei Li; Rufin VanRullen; Christof Koch; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review.

Authors:  R Kimchi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  When more is less: extraction of summary statistics benefits from larger sets.

Authors:  Nicolas Robitaille; Irina M Harris
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Re: effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.

Authors:  Robert M Nishikawa; Maryellen L Giger; Yulei Jiang; Charles E Metz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition.

Authors:  Aude Oliva; Antonio Torralba
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection.

Authors:  J W Oestmann; R Greene; D C Kushner; P M Bourgouin; L Linetsky; H J Llewellyn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Finding lung nodules with and without comparative visual scanning.

Authors:  D P Carmody; C F Nodine; H L Kundel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  27 in total

1.  Relationships between expertise and distinctiveness: Abnormal medical images lead to enhanced memory performance only in experts.

Authors:  Hayden M Schill; Jeremy M Wolfe; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-14

2.  Location- and lesion-dependent estimation of mammographic background tissue complexity.

Authors:  Ali Avanaki; Kathryn Espig; Tom Kimpe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-12

3.  Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images.

Authors:  Melissa Treviño; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Marcin Czarniecki; Peter L Choyke; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-01-03

4.  Gist processing in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Nicholas M D'Ardenne; Robert M Nishikawa; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-12-18

5.  Visual search in breast imaging.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparable prediction of breast cancer risk from a glimpse or a first impression of a mammogram.

Authors:  E M Raat; I Farr; J M Wolfe; K K Evans
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-11-06

7.  Detecting the "gist" of breast cancer in mammograms three years before localized signs of cancer are visible.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne-Marie Culpan; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Left-right breast asymmetry and risk of screen-detected and interval cancers in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  What do experts look at and what do experts find when reading mammograms?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Chia-Chien Wu; Jonathan Li; Sneha B Suresh
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 10.  Visual Illusions in Radiology: Untrue Perceptions in Medical Images and Their Implications for Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Fahd Yazdanie; Stephen Waite; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Srinivas Kolla; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.