Literature DB >> 25851469

Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.

Maxine Tan1, Jiantao Pu2, Samuel Cheng3, Hong Liu3, Bin Zheng3,2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and assess a new quantitative four-view mammographic image feature based fusion model to predict the near-term breast cancer risk of the individual women after a negative screening mammography examination of interest. The dataset included fully-anonymized mammograms acquired on 870 women with two sequential full-field digital mammography examinations. For each woman, the first "prior" examination in the series was interpreted as negative (not recalled) during the original image reading. In the second "current" examination, 430 women were diagnosed with pathology verified cancers and 440 remained negative ("cancer-free"). For each of four bilateral craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique view images of left and right breasts, we computed and analyzed eight groups of global mammographic texture and tissue density image features. A risk prediction model based on three artificial neural networks was developed to fuse image features computed from two bilateral views of four images. The risk model performance was tested using a ten-fold cross-validation method and a number of performance evaluation indices including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and odds ratio (OR). The highest AUC = 0.725 ± 0.026 was obtained when the model was trained by gray-level run length statistics texture features computed on dense breast regions, which was significantly higher than the AUC values achieved using the model trained by only two bilateral one-view images (p < 0.02). The adjustable OR values monotonically increased from 1.0 to 11.8 as model-generated risk score increased. The regression analysis of OR values also showed a significant increase trend in slope (p < 0.01). As a result, this preliminary study demonstrated that a new four-view mammographic image feature based risk model could provide useful and supplementary image information to help predict the near-term breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Computer-aided detection (CAD); Full-field digital mammography (FFDM); Mammographic density feature analysis; Near-term breast cancer risk stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851469      PMCID: PMC4573236          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1316-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  36 in total

1.  Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses.

Authors:  N R Mudigonda; R M Rangayyan; J E Desautels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Authors:  W A Berg; C Campassi; P Langenberg; M J Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Computerized assessment of tissue composition on digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Yuan-Hsiang Chang; Xiao-Hui Wang; Lara A Hardesty; Thomas S Chang; William R Poller; Walter F Good; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  WLD: a robust local image descriptor.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Shiguang Shan; Chu He; Guoying Zhao; Matti Pietikäinen; Xilin Chen; Wen Gao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Texture analysis of aggressive and nonaggressive lung tumor CE CT images.

Authors:  Omar S Al-Kadi; D Watson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Laszlo Szekely; Louise Eriksson; Boel Heddson; Ann Sundbom; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  14 in total

1.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms: a quantitative assessment.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Mundher Al-Shabi; Wai Yee Chan; Leya Thomas; Kartini Rahmat; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Wei Liu; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Assessment of global and local region-based bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry to predict short-term breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Yane Li; Ming Fan; Hu Cheng; Peng Zhang; Bin Zheng; Lihua Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Faranak Aghaei; Yunzhi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A Comparison of Computer-Aided Diagnosis Schemes Optimized Using Radiomics and Deep Transfer Learning Methods.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran Maryada; Warid Islam; Rowzat Faiz; Meredith Jones; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

6.  Prediction of Short-Term Breast Cancer Risk with Fusion of CC- and MLO-Based Risk Models in Four-View Mammograms.

Authors:  Yane Li; Wei Yuan; Ming Fan; Bin Zheng; Lihua Li
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 4.903

7.  Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Shiju Yan; Yunzhi Wang; Faranak Aghaei; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Convolutional Neural Network Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Mammographic Dataset.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Jenika Karcich; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  An effective fine grading method of BI-RADS classification in mammography.

Authors:  Fei Lin; Hang Sun; Lu Han; Jing Li; Nan Bao; Hong Li; Jing Chen; Shi Zhou; Tao Yu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.