Literature DB >> 8223680

A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience.

S Ciatto1, M Zappa.   

Abstract

The association between mammographic parenchymal patterns and the risk of subsequent breast cancer was studied in a cohort of 17,911 women aged 40-70 years, enrolled in a mammographic screening program. The cohort was prospectively followed-up for 5 years after blind attribution of mammographic pattern. Incident cancers, either screen- or interval-detected, were monitored through the screening program and by the local cancer registry. Multivariate analysis adjusting for the confounding effect of age, demonstrated an independent and significant association between mammographic patterns and breast cancer risk. The relative risk of subsequent breast cancer, assumed to be 1 for N1 pattern, was 2.39 (1.0-5.7) for P1, 4.02 (1.7-9.3) for P2, and 5.01 (1.9-13.3) for DY category, respectively. The relative risk of P2-DY with respect to N1-P1 categories was 2.09 (1.4-3.1). A diagnostic delay, possibly due to the 'masking effect' of a radiologically dense breast, was evident for P2-DY with respect to N1-P1 cancers (proportion of Stage I cancers = 42% vs. 69%). These results suggest the adoption of a shorter rescreening interval in P2-DY subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8223680     DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(93)90048-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  20 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification.

Authors:  D Bernardi; M Pellegrini; S Di Michele; P Tuttobene; C Fantò; M Valentini; M Gentilini; S Ciatto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  A breast density index for digital mammograms based on radiologists' ranking.

Authors:  J M Boone; K K Lindfors; C S Beatty; J A Seibert
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Elisa Regini; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Gianluca Ghione; Andrea Luparia; Pier Paolo Campanino; Caterina Chiara Bianchi; Laura Bergamasco; Paolo Fonio; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Chang Sun; Umnouy Ponsukcharoen; Dezheng Huo; Li Lan; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Andrew R Jamieson; Jeremy Bancroft Brown; Anna Di Rienzo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Standardized uptake values of normal breast tissue with 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D: -glucose positron emission tomography: variations with age, breast density, and menopausal status.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Anil Chauhan; Hongming Zhuang; Prem Chandra; Mitchell Schnall; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Prenatal smoke exposure and mammographic density in mid-life.

Authors:  M B Terry; C A Schaefer; J D Flom; Y Wei; P Tehranifar; Y Liao; S Buka; K B Michels
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Gils; J D Otten; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Association between mammographic features and clinicopathological characteristics in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast cancer.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Sun; Bin Zhang; Hong-Meng Zhao; Xu-Chen Cao
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-19

9.  In utero DDT exposure and breast density before age 50.

Authors:  Nickilou Y Krigbaum; Piera M Cirillo; Julie D Flom; Jasmine A McDonald; Mary Beth Terry; Barbara A Cohn
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.143

10.  Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Xingwei Wang; Amy H Klym; David Gur
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.