Literature DB >> 29239858

Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.

Morteza Heidari1, Abolfazl Zargari Khuzani, Alan B Hollingsworth, Gopichandh Danala, Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei, Yuchen Qiu, Hong Liu, Bin Zheng.   

Abstract

In order to automatically identify a set of effective mammographic image features and build an optimal breast cancer risk stratification model, this study aims to investigate advantages of applying a machine learning approach embedded with a locally preserving projection (LPP) based feature combination and regeneration algorithm to predict short-term breast cancer risk. A dataset involving negative mammograms acquired from 500 women was assembled. This dataset was divided into two age-matched classes of 250 high risk cases in which cancer was detected in the next subsequent mammography screening and 250 low risk cases, which remained negative. First, a computer-aided image processing scheme was applied to segment fibro-glandular tissue depicted on mammograms and initially compute 44 features related to the bilateral asymmetry of mammographic tissue density distribution between left and right breasts. Next, a multi-feature fusion based machine learning classifier was built to predict the risk of cancer detection in the next mammography screening. A leave-one-case-out (LOCO) cross-validation method was applied to train and test the machine learning classifier embedded with a LLP algorithm, which generated a new operational vector with 4 features using a maximal variance approach in each LOCO process. Results showed a 9.7% increase in risk prediction accuracy when using this LPP-embedded machine learning approach. An increased trend of adjusted odds ratios was also detected in which odds ratios increased from 1.0 to 11.2. This study demonstrated that applying the LPP algorithm effectively reduced feature dimensionality, and yielded higher and potentially more robust performance in predicting short-term breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29239858      PMCID: PMC5801007          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa1ca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  28 in total

1.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Authors:  W A Berg; C Campassi; P Langenberg; M J Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Risk-based mammography screening: an effort to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms.

Authors:  Otis W Brawley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Reduction of bias and variance for evaluation of computer-aided diagnostic schemes.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models.

Authors:  Eitan Amir; Orit C Freedman; Bostjan Seruga; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Applying a new quantitative global breast MRI feature analysis scheme to assess tumor response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Faranak Aghaei; Maxine Tan; Alan B Hollingsworth; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu; Heung-Il Suk
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  19 in total

1.  Protein-protein interaction sites prediction by ensemble random forests with synthetic minority oversampling technique.

Authors:  Xiaoying Wang; Bin Yu; Anjun Ma; Cheng Chen; Bingqiang Liu; Qin Ma
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Applying a new quantitative image analysis scheme based on global mammographic features to assist diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuxin Chen; Abolfazl Zargari; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Wei Liu; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Applying a new computer-aided detection scheme generated imaging marker to predict short-term breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Alan B Hollingsworth; Bhavika Patel; Morteza Heidari; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A Comparison of Computer-Aided Diagnosis Schemes Optimized Using Radiomics and Deep Transfer Learning Methods.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran Maryada; Warid Islam; Rowzat Faiz; Meredith Jones; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

7.  Developing new quantitative CT image markers to predict prognosis of acute ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Gopichandh Danala; Bappaditya Ray; Masoom Desai; Morteza Heidari; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Sai Kiran R Maryada; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.442

8.  Convolutional Neural Network Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Mammographic Dataset.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Jenika Karcich; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Prediction of chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer patients using a new clustered quantitative image marker.

Authors:  Abolfazl Zargari; Yue Du; Morteza Heidari; Theresa C Thai; Camille C Gunderson; Kathleen Moore; Robert S Mannel; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Applying a Random Projection Algorithm to Optimize Machine Learning Model for Breast Lesion Classification.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Sivaramakrishnan Lakshmivarahan; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran R Maryada; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.