Literature DB >> 29226849

Assessment of global and local region-based bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry to predict short-term breast cancer risk.

Yane Li1, Ming Fan, Hu Cheng, Peng Zhang, Bin Zheng, Lihua Li.   

Abstract

This study aims to develop and test a new imaging marker-based short-term breast cancer risk prediction model. An age-matched dataset of 566 screening mammography cases was used. All 'prior' images acquired in the two screening series were negative, while in the 'current' screening images, 283 cases were positive for cancer and 283 cases remained negative. For each case, two bilateral cranio-caudal view mammograms acquired from the 'prior' negative screenings were selected and processed by a computer-aided image processing scheme, which segmented the entire breast area into nine strip-based local regions, extracted the element regions using difference of Gaussian filters, and computed both global- and local-based bilateral asymmetrical image features. An initial feature pool included 190 features related to the spatial distribution and structural similarity of grayscale values, as well as of the magnitude and phase responses of multidirectional Gabor filters. Next, a short-term breast cancer risk prediction model based on a generalized linear model was built using an embedded stepwise regression analysis method to select features and a leave-one-case-out cross-validation method to predict the likelihood of each woman having image-detectable cancer in the next sequential mammography screening. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values significantly increased from 0.5863  ±  0.0237 to 0.6870  ±  0.0220 when the model trained by the image features extracted from the global regions and by the features extracted from both the global and the matched local regions (p  =  0.0001). The odds ratio values monotonically increased from 1.00-8.11 with a significantly increasing trend in slope (p  =  0.0028) as the model-generated risk score increased. In addition, the AUC values were 0.6555  ±  0.0437, 0.6958  ±  0.0290, and 0.7054  ±  0.0529 for the three age groups of 37-49, 50-65, and 66-87 years old, respectively. AUC values of 0.6529  ±  0.1100, 0.6820  ±  0.0353, 0.6836  ±  0.0302 and 0.8043  ±  0.1067 were yielded for the four mammography density sub-groups (BIRADS from 1-4), respectively. This study demonstrated that bilateral asymmetry features extracted from local regions combined with the global region in bilateral negative mammograms could be used as a new imaging marker to assist in the prediction of short-term breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29226849      PMCID: PMC5773392          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  38 in total

1.  Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E Desautels; A F Frère
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.

Authors:  Paola Casti; Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri; Antonietta Ancona; Fabio Felice Mangieri; Maria Luisa Pepe; Rangaraj Mandayam Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Model for individualized prediction of breast cancer risk after a benign breast biopsy.

Authors:  V Shane Pankratz; Amy C Degnim; Ryan D Frank; Marlene H Frost; Daniel W Visscher; Robert A Vierkant; Tina J Hieken; Karthik Ghosh; Yaman Tarabishy; Celine M Vachon; Derek C Radisky; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Samuel Cheng; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Association between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maxine Tan; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.

Authors:  Edward A Sickles; Dulcy E Wolverton; Katherine E Dee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Cancer statistics, 2013.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 8.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Kimberly Andrews; Durado Brooks; Carol E DeSantis; Stacey A Fedewa; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Otis W Brawley; Richard C Wender
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features.

Authors:  Lothar Häberle; Florian Wagner; Peter A Fasching; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Christian R Loehberg; Alexander Hein; Christian M Bayer; Carolin C Hack; Michael P Lux; Katja Binder; Matthias Elter; Christian Münzenmayer; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Martina Meier-Meitinger; Boris R Adamietz; Michael Uder; Matthias W Beckmann; Thomas Wittenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction of Short-Term Breast Cancer Risk with Fusion of CC- and MLO-Based Risk Models in Four-View Mammograms.

Authors:  Yane Li; Wei Yuan; Ming Fan; Bin Zheng; Lihua Li
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 4.903

2.  Convolutional Neural Network Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Mammographic Dataset.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Jenika Karcich; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  An effective fine grading method of BI-RADS classification in mammography.

Authors:  Fei Lin; Hang Sun; Lu Han; Jing Li; Nan Bao; Hong Li; Jing Chen; Shi Zhou; Tao Yu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.