Literature DB >> 22542804

Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.

Eyal M Reingold1, Erik D Reichle, Mackenzie G Glaholt, Heather Sheridan.   

Abstract

Participants' eye movements were monitored in an experiment that manipulated the frequency of target words (high vs. low) as well as their availability for parafoveal processing during fixations on the pre-target word (valid vs. invalid preview). The influence of the word-frequency by preview validity manipulation on the distributions of first fixation duration was examined by using ex-Gaussian fitting as well as a novel survival analysis technique which provided precise estimates of the timing of the first discernible influence of word frequency on first fixation duration. Using this technique, we found a significant influence of word frequency on fixation duration in normal reading (valid preview) as early as 145ms from the start of fixation. We also demonstrated an equally rapid non-lexical influence on first fixation duration as a function of initial landing position (location) on target words. The time-course of frequency effects, but not location effects was strongly influenced by preview validity, demonstrating the crucial role of parafoveal processing in enabling direct lexical control of reading fixation times. Implications for models of eye-movement control are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542804      PMCID: PMC3565237          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  74 in total

1.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  E D Reichle; K Rayner; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making.

Authors:  R VanRullen; S J Thorpe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Jinmian Yang; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

6.  Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Natasha Tokowicz; Ying Liu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The visual characteristics of words.

Authors:  P Dunn-Rankin
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  Using puns to study contextual influences on lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold; Meredyth Daneman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

10.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge; Sarah J White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  40 in total

1.  Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

4.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

5.  The location-based Simon effect: Reliability of ex-Gaussian analysis.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

6.  The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

7.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

8.  Percentile rank pooling: A simple nonparametric method for comparing group reaction time distributions with few trials.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

9.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.