Literature DB >> 20731513

The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.

Eyal M Reingold1, Jinmian Yang, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Participants' eye movements were monitored while they read sentences in which high-frequency and low-frequency target words were presented either in normal font (e.g., account) or case alternated (e.g., aCcOuNt). The influence of the word frequency and case alternation manipulations on fixation times was examined. Although both manipulations had comparable effects on standard first-pass fixation measures, word frequency, but not case alternation was found to influence the duration of the first fixation in trials with multiple first-pass fixations. Assuming that lexical processing is more often incomplete at the termination of the first in multiple first-pass fixations than at the end of single first-pass fixations, the present findings provide strong evidence for an influence of word frequency on early lexical processing. Importantly, such a demonstration of a fast acting influence of a lexical variable on fixation times satisfies a critical prerequisite for establishing lexical control of eye movements in reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20731513     DOI: 10.1037/a0019959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence of different loci for case-mixing and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen; Caitlin Crawford
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

4.  Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural reading.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The resolution of visual noise in word recognition.

Authors:  Hye K Pae; Yong-Won Lee
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-06

6.  Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading.

Authors:  Guojie Ma; Xingshan Li; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Case mixing impedes early lexical access: converging evidence from the masked priming paradigm.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

9.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Erik D Reichle; Mackenzie G Glaholt; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Aging, parafoveal preview, and semantic integration in sentence processing: testing the cognitive workload of wrap-up.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.