Literature DB >> 24876432

Clinical evaluation of a novel on-strip calibration method for blood glucose measurement.

Michael Noble1, John Rippeth2, David Edington2, Gerry Rayman3, Sarah Brandon-Jones4, Zoe Hollowood4, Simon Kew4.   

Abstract

This study evaluated a novel technology for improving accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). The technology calibrates each and every test by measuring the response from a predetermined amount of glucose present in the sample chamber of each test strip. SMBG test strips were modified to include a lid coated with a fast dissolving formulation containing glucose. These test strips were characterized for hematocrit (Hct) and temperature induced error response to develop a calibration algorithm. The modified test strips were used in a clinical evaluation involving fingerstick blood samples from 160 subjects. Experiments involving Hct and temperature induced errors show that the technology generates a signal characteristic of the error conditions in any particular test, but independent of glucose concentration, allowing a correction algorithm to be derived. The approach substantially reduced Hct and temperature derived errors. Clinical evaluation using fingerstick blood directly applied to prototype strips showed the error (measured as MARD) was reduced from 11.1 to 5.9% by the on-strip correction approach and the number of outliers reduced by approximately 90%. This technology could improve the accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring systems and so reduce decision errors particularly in clinical situations where hematocrit and temperature may be significant confounders.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; blood glucose monitoring; error; hematocrit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876432      PMCID: PMC4764217          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814532575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  17 in total

1.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.

Authors:  J L Parkes; S L Slatin; S Pardo; B H Ginsberg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes: recommendations for standard, comprehensive, and minimal care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Volker Lodwig; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

6.  Effect of ambient temperature on analytical performance of self-monitoring blood glucose systems.

Authors:  Kari Nerhus; Pål Rustad; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Eva Zschornack; Serge Kocher; Jacques Tshiananga; Frank Heister; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.

Authors:  Chih-Yi Kuo; Cheng-Teng Hsu; Cheng-Shiao Ho; Ting-En Su; Ming-Hsun Wu; Chau-Jong Wang
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.

Authors:  Cornelius Tack; Harald Pohlmeier; Thomas Behnke; Volkmar Schmid; Marco Grenningloh; Thomas Forst; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  2 in total

1.  Calibration-Free Electrochemical Biosensors Supporting Accurate Molecular Measurements Directly in Undiluted Whole Blood.

Authors:  Hui Li; Philippe Dauphin-Ducharme; Gabriel Ortega; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Calibration-Free Measurement of Phenylalanine Levels in the Blood Using an Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensor Suitable for Point-of-Care Applications.

Authors:  Andrea Idili; Claudio Parolo; Gabriel Ortega; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 7.711

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.