Literature DB >> 15220370

Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640.

P J Twomey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is an important diagnosis. New criteria have been defined for impaired glucose metabolism and, accordingly, there is a need for precise and accurate glucose analysis for the correct classification of patients. However, neither the World Health Organisation nor the National Service Framework for Diabetes in England and Wales deal with the associated analytical issues for plasma glucose. AIMS/
METHODS: To compare two different methods for plasma glucose with respect to European and CLIA '88 quality requirements.
RESULTS: Using several different graphical and statistical techniques, the YSI 2300 STAT was found to be 8.1-8.4% negatively biased for plasma glucose when compared with the Olympus AU640 method.
CONCLUSIONS: Such a large bias would have a large impact on the detection of diabetes mellitus in clinical practice and therefore this method should not be used to make a definitive diagnosis. The bias probably results from the fact that the YSI 2300 STAT uses an aqueous based standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220370      PMCID: PMC1770357          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2003.013417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis.

Authors:  K Linnet
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  A method evaluation decision chart (MEDx chart) for judging method performance.

Authors:  J O Westgard
Journal:  Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

3.  Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs; regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA)--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1992-02-28

Review 4.  Intra- and inter-individual biological variability data bank.

Authors:  M A Sebastián-Gámbaro; F J Lirón-Hernández; X Fuentes-Arderiu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-11

5.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology.

Authors:  C G Fraser; P Hyltoft Petersen; J C Libeer; C Ricos
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.057

7.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; David E Bruns; David E Goldstein; Noel K Maclaren; Jay M McDonald; Marian Parrott
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Optimization of preanalytical conditions and analysis of plasma glucose. 1. Impact of the new WHO and ADA recommendations on diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M Stahl; L G Jørgensen; P Hyltoft Petersen; I Brandslund; N de Fine Olivarius; K Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.713

9.  Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose Analyzer.

Authors:  K S Chua; I K Tan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 8.327

  9 in total
  29 in total

1.  Glucose information for tight glycemic control: different methods with different challenges.

Authors:  Christian Weber; Kurt Neeser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Volker Lodwig; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

3.  In response to Teodorczyk and coauthors: System accuracy of blood glucose monitoring devices according to the current and proposed ISO 15197 standards.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

4.  Analysis of "Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of a New, Wireless-Enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device".

Authors:  Malte Rutschmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  Fundamental Importance of Reference Glucose Analyzer Accuracy for Evaluating the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMSs).

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey; Leslie J Klaff; Jane F Wallace; Carmine Greene; Scott Pardo; Bern Harrison; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

6.  Technical aspects of the Parkes error grid.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; David C Klonoff; Scott Pardo; Joan L Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  Performance and System Validation of a New Cellular-Enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using a New Standard Reference Measurement Procedure of Isotope Dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kimon Angelides; Risë K Matsunami; David A Engler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-22

8.  Hematocrit interference of blood glucose meters for patient self-measurement.

Authors:  Sanja Ramljak; John Paul Lock; Christina Schipper; Petra B Musholt; Thomas Forst; Martha Lyon; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

9.  Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Debbie Mondesir; Norman Lautsch; Courtney Balliro; Mallory Hillard; Kendra Magyar; Laura Goergen Radocchia; Aryan Esmaeili; Manasi Sinha; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-03

Review 10.  Measures of Accuracy for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Stefan Pleus; Mike Grady; Steven Setford; Brian Levy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.