Literature DB >> 22528872

Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection.

Anastasia Kiyonaga1, Tobias Egner, David Soto.   

Abstract

Across many studies, researchers have found that representations in working memory (WM) can guide visual attention toward items that match the features of the WM contents. While some researchers have contended that this occurs involuntarily, others have suggested that the impact of WM contents on attention can be strategically controlled. Here, we varied the probability that WM items would coincide with either targets or distractors in a visual search task to examine (1) whether participants could intentionally enhance or inhibit the influence of WM items on attention and (2) whether cognitive control over WM biases would also affect access to the memory contents in a surprise recognition test. We found visual search to be faster when the WM item coincided with the search target, and this effect was enhanced when the memory item reliably predicted the location of the target. Conversely, visual search was slowed when the memory item coincided with a search distractor, and this effect was diminished, but not abolished, when the memory item was reliably associated with distractors. This strategic dampening of the influence of WM items on attention came at a price to memory, however, as participants were slowest to perform WM recognition tests on blocks in which the WM contents were consistently invalid. These results document that attentional capture by WM contents is partly, but not fully, malleable by top-down control, which appears to adjust the state of the WM contents to optimize search behavior. These data illustrate the role of cognitive control in modulating the strength of WM biases of selection, and they support a tight coupling between WM and attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528872      PMCID: PMC3394896          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0253-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  On the difference between working memory and attentional set.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Dietmar Heinke; Glyn W Humphreys; Manuel J Blanco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The interrelations between verbal working memory and visual selection of emotional faces.

Authors:  Alessandro Grecucci; David Soto; Raffaella Ida Rumiati; Glyn W Humphreys; Pia Rotshtein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Stressing the mind: the effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-07

6.  Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.

Authors:  Judith C Peters; Rainer Goebel; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; John Hodsoll; Pia Rotshtein; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention.

Authors:  Yi Pan; David Soto
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Working memory can guide pop-out search.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys; Dietmar Heinke
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  30 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Mathilde M Ooi; Tobias Egner; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; John M Pearson; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

7.  Opening the gate to working memory.

Authors:  David Badre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

10.  Thalamic control of human attention driven by memory and learning.

Authors:  José de Bourbon-Teles; Paul Bentley; Saori Koshino; Kushal Shah; Agneish Dutta; Paresh Malhotra; Tobias Egner; Masud Husain; David Soto
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.