Literature DB >> 28155212

Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.

Emma Wu Dowd1,2, John M Pearson3, Tobias Egner3.   

Abstract

What we are currently thinking influences where we attend. The finding that active maintenance of visual items in working memory (WM) biases attention toward memory-matching objects-even when WM content is irrelevant for attentional goals-suggests a tight link between WM and attention. To test whether this link is reliable enough to infer specific WM content from measures of attentional bias, we applied multivariate pattern classification techniques to response times from an unrelated visual search task during a WM delay. Single-trial WM content was successfully decoded from incidental attentional bias within an individual, highlighting the specificity and reliability of the WM-attention link. Furthermore, classifiers trained on a group of individuals predicted WM content in another, completely independent individual-implying a shared cognitive mechanism of memory-driven attentional bias. The existence of such classifiers demonstrates that memory-based attentional bias is both a robust and generalizable probe of WM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional bias; Multivariate pattern classification; Visual attention; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28155212      PMCID: PMC5540835          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1204-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Dietmar Heinke; Glyn W Humphreys; Manuel J Blanco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; John Hodsoll; Pia Rotshtein; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.

Authors:  Johannes Stelzer; Yi Chen; Robert Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Some evidence for unconscious lie detection.

Authors:  Leanne Ten Brinke; Dayna Stimson; Dana R Carney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03-21

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Reconsidering Yarbus: a failure to predict observers' task from eye movement patterns.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Tommy Liu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Clayton E Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Classifying mental states from eye movements during scene viewing.

Authors:  Omid Kardan; Marc G Berman; Grigori Yourganov; Joseph Schmidt; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Predicting cognitive state from eye movements.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Svetlana V Shinkareva; Jing Wang; Steven G Luke; Jenn Olejarczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

3.  Cognitive control over prospective task-set interference.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Forty years after feature integration theory: An introduction to the special issue in honor of the contributions of Anne Treisman.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.

Authors:  Blaire Dube; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-23

6.  Theoretical distinction between functional states in working memory and their corresponding neural states.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Paul S Muhle-Karbe; Nicholas E Myers
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-09-24

7.  More attention with less working memory: The active inhibition of attended but outdated information.

Authors:  Yingtao Fu; Yiling Zhou; Jifan Zhou; Mowei Shen; Hui Chen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.