Literature DB >> 24958685

The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Anastasia Kiyonaga1, Tobias Egner2.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) has recently been described as internally directed attention, which implies that WM content should affect behavior exactly like an externally perceived and attended stimulus. We tested whether holding a color word in WM, rather than attending to it in the external environment, can produce interference in a color-discrimination task, which would mimic the classic Stroop effect. Over three experiments, the WM Stroop effect recapitulated core properties of the classic attentional Stroop effect, displaying equivalent congruency effects, additive contributions from stimulus- and response-level congruency, and susceptibility to modulation by the percentage of congruent and incongruent trials. Moreover, WM maintenance was inversely related to attentional demands during the WM delay between stimulus presentation and recall, with poorer memory performance following incongruent than congruent trials. Together, these results suggest that WM and attention rely on the same resources and operate over the same representations.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  open materials; selective attention; short-term memory; visual attention; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24958685      PMCID: PMC4275427          DOI: 10.1177/0956797614536739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  37 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Common neural mechanisms supporting spatial working memory, attention and motor intention.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load.

Authors:  Jöran Lepsien; Ivan C Griffin; Joseph T Devlin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

5.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Foraging for thought: an inhibition-of-return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Julie A Higgins; Kenneth A Norman; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-07

7.  Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  The extent of center-surround inhibition for colored items in working memory.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Heming Gao; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-16

2.  Neural processes underlying the orienting of attention without awareness.

Authors:  Charles M Giattino; Zaynah M Alam; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.

Authors:  Suk Won Han
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04

4.  Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Hemisphere-specific Parietal Contributions to the Interplay between Working Memory and Attention.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; John P Powers; Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.420

7.  Does the presence of more features in a bound representation in working memory require extra object-based attention?

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Fan Wu; Xueyi Wan; Mowei Shen; Zaifeng Gao
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.

Authors:  Blaire Dube; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-23

9.  Spatial specificity of feature-based interaction between working memory and visual processing.

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Inhibition-of-return-like effects in working memory? A preregistered replication study of Johnson et al. (2013).

Authors:  Naomi Langerock; Giuliana Sposito; Caro Hautekiet; Evie Vergauwe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.