Literature DB >> 18702589

Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.

Judith C Peters1, Rainer Goebel, Pieter R Roelfsema.   

Abstract

If we search for an item, a representation of this item in our working memory guides attention to matching items in the visual scene. We can hold multiple items in working memory. Do all these items guide attention in parallel? We asked participants to detect a target object in a stream of objects while they maintained a second item in memory for a subsequent task. On some trials, we presented this memory item as a distractor in the stream. Subjects did not confuse these memory items with the search target, as the false alarm rate on trials where the memory item was presented in the stream was comparable to that on trials with only regular distractors. However, a comparable performance does not exclude that the memory items are processed differently from normal distractors. We therefore recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by search targets, memory items, and regular distractors. As expected, ERPs evoked by search targets differed from those evoked by distractors. Search targets elicited an occipital selection negativity and a frontal selection positivity indexing selective attention, whereas the P3b component, which reflects the matching of sensory events to memory representations, was enhanced for targets compared to distractors. Remarkably, the ERPs evoked by memory items were indistinguishable from the ERPs evoked by normal distractors. This implies that the search target has a special status in working memory that is not shared by the other items. These other, "accessory" items do not guide attention and are excluded from the matching process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18702589     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-07-18

2.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Using a Large-scale Neural Model of Cortical Object Processing to Investigate the Neural Substrate for Managing Multiple Items in Short-term Memory.

Authors:  Qin Liu; Antonio Ulloa; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Monkey prefrontal neurons during Sternberg task performance: full contents of working memory or most recent item?

Authors:  R O Konecky; M A Smith; C R Olson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-08

Review 7.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

8.  When memory is not enough: electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

10.  Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.