Literature DB >> 30938591

Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.

Peter S Whitehead1, Mathilde M Ooi1, Tobias Egner1, Marty G Woldorff1,2.   

Abstract

The contents of working memory (WM) guide visual attention toward matching features, with visual search being faster when the target and a feature of an item held in WM spatially overlap (validly cued) than when they occur at different locations (invalidly cued). Recent behavioral studies have indicated that attentional capture by WM content can be modulated by cognitive control: When WM cues are reliably helpful to visual search (predictably valid), capture is enhanced, but when reliably detrimental (predictably invalid), capture is attenuated. The neural mechanisms underlying this effect are not well understood, however. Here, we leveraged the high temporal resolution of ERPs time-locked to the onset of the search display to determine how and at what processing stage cognitive control modulates the search process. We manipulated predictability by grouping trials into unpredictable (50% valid/invalid) and predictable (100% valid, 100% invalid) blocks. Behavioral results confirmed that predictability modulated WM-related capture. Comparison of ERPs to the search arrays showed that the N2pc, a posteriorly distributed signature of initial attentional orienting toward a lateralized target, was not impacted by target validity predictability. However, a longer latency, more anterior, lateralized effect-here, termed the "contralateral attention-related negativity"-was reduced under predictable conditions. This reduction interacted with validity, with substantially greater reduction for invalid than valid trials. These data suggest cognitive control over attentional capture by WM content does not affect the initial attentional-orienting process but can reduce the need to marshal later control mechanisms for processing relevant items in the visual world.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30938591      PMCID: PMC7002893          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  33 in total

1.  Early posterior ERP components do not reflect the control of attentional shifts toward expected peripheral events.

Authors:  José van Velzen; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; John Hodsoll; Pia Rotshtein; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Task-relevant and accessory items in working memory have opposite effects on activity in extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Judith C Peters; Pieter R Roelfsema; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

6.  An ERP study on visual spatial priming with peripheral onsets.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  "Sensory gating" as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-06

8.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Vincent Di Lollo; John J McDonald
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Authors:  Javier Lopez-Calderon; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-27

2.  Training modulates memory-driven capture.

Authors:  Edyta Sasin; Florian Sense; Mark Nieuwenstein; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.