Literature DB >> 22526280

Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.

H Precht1, O Gerke, K Rosendahl, A Tingberg, D Waaler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New developments in processing of digital radiographs (DR), including multi-frequency processing (MFP), allow optimization of image quality and radiation dose. This is particularly promising in children as they are believed to be more sensitive to ionizing radiation than adults.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the use of MFP software reduces the radiation dose without compromising quality at DR of the femur in 5-year-old-equivalent anthropomorphic and technical phantoms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 110 images of an anthropomorphic phantom were imaged on a DR system (Canon DR with CXDI-50 C detector and MLT[S] software) and analyzed by three pediatric radiologists using Visual Grading Analysis. In addition, 3,500 images taken of a technical contrast-detail phantom (CDRAD 2.0) provide an objective image-quality assessment.
RESULTS: Optimal image-quality was maintained at a dose reduction of 61% with MLT(S) optimized images. Even for images of diagnostic quality, MLT(S) provided a dose reduction of 88% as compared to the reference image. Software impact on image quality was found significant for dose (mAs), dynamic range dark region and frequency band.
CONCLUSION: By optimizing image processing parameters, a significant dose reduction is possible without significant loss of image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526280     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-012-2385-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  12 in total

1.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.

Authors:  A Almén; A Tingberg; S Mattsson; J Besjakov; S Kheddache; B Lanhede; L G Månsson; M Zankl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique.

Authors:  P C Brennan; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.

Authors:  Karl Ludwig; Kathrin Ahlers; Dag Wormanns; Michael Freund; Thomas M Bernhardt; Stefan Diederich; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Skeletal applications for flat-panel versus storage-phosphor radiography: effect of exposure on detection of low-contrast details.

Authors:  Martin Uffmann; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Michael Weber; Christian J Herold; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2004

7.  Quality assurance: the missing link.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Khan M Siddiqui; Amy E Musk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.

Authors:  B Lanhede; M Båth; S Kheddache; P Sund; L Björneld; M Widell; A Almén; J Besjakov; S Mattsson; A Tingberg; C Herrmann; W Panzer; M Zankl; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.

Authors:  Ulrike Rapp-Bernhardt; Thomas M Bernhardt; Horst Lenzen; Rainer Esseling; Friedrich W Roehl; Manfred Schiborr; Iris Theobald-Hormann; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.

Authors:  W Huda
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Large dose reduction by optimization of multifrequency processing software in digital radiography at follow-up examinations of the pediatric femur.

Authors:  Helle Precht; Oke Gerke; Karen Rosendahl; Anders Tingberg; Dag Waaler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-24

2.  New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.

Authors:  Helle Precht; Anders Tingberg; Dag Waaler; Claus Bjørn Outzen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Advances in multiscale image processing and its effects on image quality in skeletal radiography.

Authors:  Susan Notohamiprodjo; K M Roeper; F G Mueck; D Maxien; F Wanninger; B Hoberg; L Verstreepen; K M Treitl; F Fischer; O Peschel; S Wirth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Abdominal Digital Radiography with a Novel Post-Processing Technique: Phantom and Patient Studies.

Authors:  Hyein Kang; Eun Sun Lee; Hyun Jeong Park; Byung Kwan Park; Jae Yong Park; Suk-Won Suh
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-05-08

Review 5.  A paediatric X-ray exposure chart.

Authors:  Stephen P Knight
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-06-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.