Literature DB >> 11144797

The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.

A Almén1, A Tingberg, S Mattsson, J Besjakov, S Kheddache, B Lanhede, L G Månsson, M Zankl.   

Abstract

In this study we have investigated the image quality of lumbar spine radiographs taken after recording technical and physical parameters. Two technical parameters were altered, tube voltage (70 kV and 90 kV for the anteroposterior (AP) projection and 77 kV and 95 kV for the lateral projection) and sensitivity of the film-screen system (sensitivity class 400 and 600). In total, 85 images were included in the study. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured using thermoluminescent dosemeters. The mean value of ESD for the different technique groups varied between 1.9 mGy (90 kV, sensitivity class 400) and 4.6 mGy (70 kV, sensitivity class 400) for the AP projection, and between 6.4 mGy (95 kV, sensitivity class 600) and 20.4 mGy (70 kV, sensitivity class 400) for the lateral projection. Image criteria given in the "European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Radiographic Images" were used to assess image quality. Two evaluation methods have been employed. A straightforward scoring of fulfilled image criteria, and visual grading analysis using the structures defined in the image criteria. The latter method provided a sharper distinction between groups of images taken using different radiographic techniques. The average number of fulfilled image criteria for the AP projections varied between 0.74 (90 kV, sensitivity class 400) and 0.87 (70 kV, sensitivity class 400). For the lateral projection this number varied between 0.79 (95 kV, sensitivity class 600) and 0.84 (77 kV, sensitivity class 600). This study shows that image criteria are useful tools in clinical studies of image quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11144797     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.875.11144797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  A Almén; A Tingberg; J Besjakov; S Mattsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.

Authors:  H Precht; O Gerke; K Rosendahl; A Tingberg; D Waaler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17

4.  Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?

Authors:  P Doherty; D O'Leary; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.

Authors:  Helle Precht; Anders Tingberg; Dag Waaler; Claus Bjørn Outzen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Optimization of image quality and patient dose in radiographs of paediatric extremities using direct digital radiography.

Authors:  A Jones; C Ansell; C Jerrom; I D Honey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Optimisation in general radiography.

Authors:  Cj Martin
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

8.  Moving back: The radiation dose received from lumbar spine quantitative fluoroscopy compared to lumbar spine radiographs with suggestions for dose reduction.

Authors:  F E Mellor; P Thomas; A Breen
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2014-08

9.  Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Ahmed Jibril Abdi; Bo Mussmann; Alistair Mackenzie; Oke Gerke; Gitte Maria Jørgensen; Thor Eriksen Bechsgaard; Janni Jensen; Lone Brunshøj Olsen; Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-19

10.  Interventional Radiologists: a Necessary Evaluation of Technical, Protective and Technological Operation.

Authors:  Sayed Ali Rahimi; Maryam Pourkaveh
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-02-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.