Literature DB >> 11806957

The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.

B Lanhede1, M Båth, S Kheddache, P Sund, L Björneld, M Widell, A Almén, J Besjakov, S Mattsson, A Tingberg, C Herrmann, W Panzer, M Zankl, L G Månsson.   

Abstract

The Commission of the European Communities (CEC) research project "Predictivity and optimisation in medical radiation protection" addressed fundamental operational limitations in existing radiation protection mechanisms. The first part of the project aimed at investigating (1) whether the CEC image quality criteria could be used for optimization of a radiographic process and (2) whether significant differences in image quality based on these criteria could be detected in a controlled project with well known physical and technical parameters. In the present study, chest radiographs on film were produced using healthy volunteers. Four physical/technical parameters were varied in a carefully controlled manner: tube voltage (102 kVp and 141 kVp), nominal speed class (160 and 320), maximum film density (1.3 and 1.8) and method of scatter reduction (grid (R=12) and air gap). The air kerma at the entrance surface was measured for all patients and the risk-related dose H(Golem), based on calculated organ-equivalent dose conversion coefficients and the measured entrance air kerma values, was calculated. Image quality was evaluated by a group of European expert radiologists using a modified version of the CEC quality criteria. For the two density levels, density level 1.8 was significantly better than 1.3 but at the cost of a higher patient radiation exposure. The correlation between the number of fulfilled quality criteria and H(Golem) was generally poor. An air gap technique resulted in lower doses than scatter reduction with a grid but provided comparable image quality. The criteria can be used to highlight optimum radiographic technique in terms of image quality and patient dose, although not unambiguously. A recommendation for good radiographic technique based on a compromise between image quality and risk-related radiation dose to the patient is to use 141 kVp, an air gap, a screen-film system with speed 320 and an optical density of 1.8.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11806957     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.75.889.750038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  A Almén; A Tingberg; J Besjakov; S Mattsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.

Authors:  H Precht; O Gerke; K Rosendahl; A Tingberg; D Waaler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17

4.  New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.

Authors:  Helle Precht; Anders Tingberg; Dag Waaler; Claus Bjørn Outzen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.

Authors:  Sadeq Al-Murshedi; Peter Hogg; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Use of a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for the optimisation of chest radiographic techniques for computed radiography imaging systems.

Authors:  C S Moore; G Avery; S Balcam; L Needler; A Swift; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; G Avery; S Balcam; L Needler; A Smith; J R Saunderson; A W Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Optimising the use of computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.

Authors:  R Sanchez Jacob; E Vano-Galvan; E Vano; N Gomez Ruiz; J M Fernandez Soto; D Martinez Barrio; C Prieto
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Severe aortic arch calcification depicted on chest radiography strongly suggests coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Caroline Jung; Philipp Blanke; András Treszl; Thorsten Derlin; Gerhard Adam; Thorsten A Bley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.