Literature DB >> 15302167

Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

.   

Abstract

Digital techniques have the potential to improve the practice of radiology but they also risk the overuse of radiation. The main advantages of digital imaging, i.e. wide dynamic range, post processing, multiple viewing options, and electronic transfer and archiving possibilities, are clear but overexposures can occur without an adverse impact on image quality. In conventional radiography, excessive exposure produces a 'black' film. In digital systems, good images are obtained for a large range of doses. It is very easy to obtain (and delete) images with digital fluoroscopy systems, and there may be a tendency to obtain more images than necessary. In digital radiology, higher patient dose usually means improved image quality, so a tendency to use higher patient doses than necessary could occur. Different medical imaging tasks require different levels of image quality, and doses that have no additional benefit for the clinical purpose should be avoided. Image quality can be compromised by inappropriate levels of data compression and/or postprocessing techniques. All these new challenges should be part of the optimisation process and should be included in clinical and technical protocols. Local diagnostic reference levels should be re-evaluated for digital imaging, and patient dose parameters should be displayed at the operator console. Frequent patient dose audits should occur when digital techniques are introduced. Training in the management of image quality and patient dose in digital radiology is necessary. Digital radiology will involve new regulations and invoke new challenges for practitioners. As digital images are easier to obtain and transmit, the justification criteria should be reinforced. Commissioning of digital systems should involve clinical specialists, medical physicists, and radiographers to ensure that imaging capability and radiation dose management are integrated. Quality control requires new procedures and protocols (visualisation, transmission, and archiving of the images).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15302167     DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2004.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann ICRP        ISSN: 0146-6453


  22 in total

1.  Quality assurance: a comparison study of radiographic exposure for neonatal chest radiographs at 4 academic hospitals.

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen; Richard Markowitz; Jeanne Hill; Walter Huda; Paul Babyn; Bruce Apgar
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-11-06

2.  Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.

Authors:  H Precht; O Gerke; K Rosendahl; A Tingberg; D Waaler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17

3.  Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  T Svahn; B Hemdal; M Ruschin; D P Chakraborty; I Andersson; A Tingberg; S Mattsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Large dose reduction by optimization of multifrequency processing software in digital radiography at follow-up examinations of the pediatric femur.

Authors:  Helle Precht; Oke Gerke; Karen Rosendahl; Anders Tingberg; Dag Waaler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-24

5.  Image retake analysis in digital radiography using DICOM header information.

Authors:  C Prieto; E Vano; J I Ten; J M Fernandez; A I Iñiguez; N Arevalo; A Litcheva; E Crespo; A Floriano; D Martinez
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Development of Diagnostic Reference Levels Using a Real-Time Radiation Dose Monitoring System at a Cardiovascular Center in Korea.

Authors:  Jungsu Kim; Deoknam Seo; Inseok Choi; Sora Nam; Yongsu Yoon; Hyunji Kim; Jae Her; Seonggyu Han; Soonmu Kwon; Hunsik Park; Dongheon Yang; Jungmin Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography.

Authors:  Menglong Zhang; Cunkun Chu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Estimates of Patient Radiation Doses in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Information at a Large Teaching Hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Ibrahim I Suliman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Duty to Inform and Informed Consent in Diagnostic Radiology: How Ethics and Law can Better Guide Practice.

Authors:  Victoria Doudenkova; Jean-Christophe Bélisle Pipon
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-03

10.  Effect of X-ray beam quality on determination of exposure index.

Authors:  Shogo Yasumatsu; Nobukazu Tanaka; Kensuke Iwase; Yoichiro Shimizu; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.