Literature DB >> 12925714

Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.

Karl Ludwig1, Kathrin Ahlers, Dag Wormanns, Michael Freund, Thomas M Bernhardt, Stefan Diederich, Walter Heindel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess image quality and exposure dose requirements of a flat-panel detector system versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems for radiographic depiction of the lumbar spine in Cynomolgus monkeys as a pediatric model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty Cynomolgus monkeys underwent anteroposterior radiography of the lumbar spine. The size and weight of these monkeys are comparable to those of infants 3-4 months of age. Images were acquired with speed class 400 screen-film, flat-panel, and storage-phosphor systems with identical exposure dose. All other conditions were matched exactly. Additional images were acquired with the flat-panel and storage-phosphor systems at exposure doses equivalent to speed classes 800 and 1600. All images were obtained at 66 kVp without antiscatter grid. Images were assessed independently by three radiologists for visibility of 60 anatomic structures by using a five-point confidence scale. Scores were calculated for the seven combinations of imaging mode and exposure dose and were compared by using the Friedman test.
RESULTS: Scores were 1.70 (speed class 400), 1.97 (speed class 800), and 2.27 (speed class 1600) for the flat-panel system; 2.50 (speed class 400) for the screen-film system; and 2.58 (speed class 400), 2.77 (speed class 800), and 3.13 (speed class 1600) for the storage-phosphor system. Scores for the flat-panel system at speed classes 400 and 800 were significantly lower (indicating better visibility) than those of the screen-film and storage-phosphor systems (P <.05).
CONCLUSION: The flat-panel system is superior to screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in lumbar spine radiography in monkeys. With the flat-panel system, exposure dose can be reduced by 75% without loss in image quality. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12925714     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291020717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

Review 1.  Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Markus Völk; Okka W Hamer; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.

Authors:  H Precht; O Gerke; K Rosendahl; A Tingberg; D Waaler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17

3.  Slot-scan digital radiography of the lower extremities: a comparison to computed radiography with respect to image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Kwang Hwi Lee; Jong Won Kwon; Young Cheol Yoon; Sang Hee Choi; Jee Young Jung; Ji Hye Kim; Sang Jun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.