Literature DB >> 24221693

New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.

Helle Precht1, Anders Tingberg, Dag Waaler, Claus Bjørn Outzen.   

Abstract

A newly developed Digital Radiography (DR) detector has smaller pixel size and higher fill factor than earlier detector models. These technical advantages should theoretically lead to higher sensitivity and higher spatial resolution, thus making dose reduction possible without scarifying image quality compared to previous DR detector versions. To examine whether the newly developed Canon CXDI-70C DR detector provides an improved image quality and/or allows for dose reductions in hand and pelvic bone examinations as well as premature chest examinations, compared to the previous (CXDI-55C) DR detector version. A total of 450 images of a technical Contrast-Detail phantom were imaged on a DR system employing various kVp and mAs settings, providing an objective image quality assessment. In addition, 450 images of anthropomorphic phantoms were taken and analyzed by three specialized radiologists using Visual Grading Analysis (VGA). The results from the technical phantom studies showed that the image quality expressed as IQFINV values was on average approximately 45 % higher with the CXDI-70C detector compared to the CXDI-55C detector. Consistently, the VGA results from the anatomical phantom studies indicated that by using the CXDI-70C detector, diagnostic image quality could be maintained at a dose reduction of in average 30 %, depending on anatomy and kVp level. This indicates that the CXDI-70C detector is significantly more sensitive than the previous model, and supports a better clinical image quality. By using the newly developed DR detector a significant dose reduction is possible while maintaining image quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24221693      PMCID: PMC3903973          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9635-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  12 in total

1.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.

Authors:  A Almén; A Tingberg; S Mattsson; J Besjakov; S Kheddache; B Lanhede; L G Månsson; M Zankl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique.

Authors:  P C Brennan; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.

Authors:  H Precht; O Gerke; K Rosendahl; A Tingberg; D Waaler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17

Review 5.  Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation.

Authors:  M Båth; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.

Authors:  Anders Tingberg; David Sjöström
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.

Authors:  B Lanhede; M Båth; S Kheddache; P Sund; L Björneld; M Widell; A Almén; J Besjakov; S Mattsson; A Tingberg; C Herrmann; W Panzer; M Zankl; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  The effect of radiation dose reduction on clinical image quality in chest radiography of premature neonates using a dual-side readout technique computed radiography system.

Authors:  Anna Carlander; Jonny Hansson; Jonas Söderberg; Karin Steneryd; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves; S James Adelstein
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Can imaging be used for inflammatory arthritis screening?

Authors:  Mikkel Østergaard
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  4 in total

1.  Introduction of a New Parameter for Evaluation of Digital Radiography System Performance.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Choopani; Ali Chaparian
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2020-07-03

2.  Homogeneous Canine Chest Phantom Construction: A Tool for Image Quality Optimization.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Menegatti Pavan; Maria Eugênia Dela Rosa; Guilherme Giacomini; Fernando Antonio Bacchim Neto; Seizo Yamashita; Luiz Carlos Vulcano; Sergio Barbosa Duarte; José Ricardo de Arruda Miranda; Diana Rodrigues de Pina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessment of Image Quality in Digital Radiographs Submitted for Hip Dysplasia Screening.

Authors:  Lilah Moorman; Helle Precht; Janni Jensen; Eiliv Svalastoga; Dorte H Nielsen; Helle F Proschowsky; Fintan J McEvoy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-03

4.  Abdominal Digital Radiography with a Novel Post-Processing Technique: Phantom and Patient Studies.

Authors:  Hyein Kang; Eun Sun Lee; Hyun Jeong Park; Byung Kwan Park; Jae Yong Park; Suk-Won Suh
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-05-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.