Literature DB >> 22502488

Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Amy R Horwitz1, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno.   

Abstract

Simultaneous, on-frequency masking is commonly assumed to be linear with increasing noise intensity. However, some evidence suggests that, expressed in terms of signal-to-noise ratio changes with background level changes, masking slopes can vary from 0 dB/dB. These results and evidence from a large sample of subjects with normal and impaired hearing demonstrate level-dependent changes in masking, large individual differences in masking among subjects with similar thresholds in quiet, and significant correlations of masking slope with other estimates of auditory function measured in the same backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22502488      PMCID: PMC3324301          DOI: 10.1121/1.3693386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Hawkins and Stevens revisited with insert earphones.

Authors:  Adrianus J M Houtsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.

Authors:  J R Dubno; A B Schaefer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

6.  Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; B C Moore; D A Vickers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A comparative study of S-N o and E-N- o .

Authors:  C M Reed; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.

Authors:  Richard J Baker; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

2.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.