Literature DB >> 16158647

Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking.

Judy R Dubno1, Amy R Horwitz, Jayne B Ahlstrom.   

Abstract

Under certain conditions, speech recognition in noise decreases above conversational levels when signal-to-noise ratio is held constant. The current study was undertaken to determine if nonlinear growth of masking and the subsequent reduction in "effective" signal-to-noise ratio accounts for this decline. Nine young adults with normal hearing listened to monosyllabic words at three levels in each of three levels of a masker shaped to match the speech spectrum. An additional low-level noise equated audibility by producing equivalent masked thresholds for all subjects. If word recognition was determined entirely by signal-to-noise ratio and was independent of overall speech and masker levels, scores at a given signal-to-noise ratio should remain constant with increasing level. Masked pure-tone thresholds measured in the speech-shaped maskers increased linearly with increasing masker level at lower frequencies but nonlinearly at higher frequencies, consistent with nonlinear growth of upward spread of masking that followed the peaks in the spectrum of the speech-shaped masker. Word recognition declined significantly with increasing level when signal-to-noise ratio was held constant which was attributed to nonlinear growth of masking and reduced "effective" signal-to-noise ratio at high speech-shaped masker levels, as indicated by audibility estimates based on the Articulation Index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16158647     DOI: 10.1121/1.1953107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Exploring Use of the Coordinate Response Measure in a Multitalker Babble Paradigm.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

Review 5.  Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline; Florian Occelli; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Effects of Steady-State Noise on Verbal Working Memory in Young Adults.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Mary Alt; Gayle DeDe; Sarah Olson; James Shehorn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Maximizing audibility and speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression by estimating audible bandwidth.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Marc A Brennan; Brenda Hoover; Judy Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.