Literature DB >> 1775656

Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.

J R Dubno1, A B Schaefer.   

Abstract

When evaluating frequency selectivity, it is difficult to determine if the deviation from normal performance observed for hearing-impaired listeners reflects abnormal cochlear function or normal, level-dependent changes in frequency selectivity. This experiment was designed to investigate the dependence of frequency-selectivity measures on threshold and signal level. Auditory-filter characteristics, critical ratios, forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves, and narrowband-noise masking patterns were obtained from normal-hearing listeners in quite and in the presence of broadband noise at five levels. These findings were then compared to previously obtained frequency-selectivity measurements for subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss whose absolute thresholds are comparable to the normal-hearing listeners' masked thresholds. The results suggest that frequency selectivity deterioriates as threshold increases for all subjects. However, the poor frequency selectivity exhibited by hearing-impaired listeners may not be explained entirely by the effects of threshold and signal level. Nevertheless, because frequency selectivity is poorer in the normal auditory system at higher stimulus levels, the deviation from normal performance observed for hearing-impaired listeners may not be as large as previously suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775656     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  7 in total

1.  Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

3.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon; Erica J Williams
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

7.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.