Literature DB >> 21117751

Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Melanie J Gregan1, Peggy B Nelson, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Hearing-impaired (HI) listeners often show poorer performance on psychoacoustic tasks than do normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Although some such deficits may reflect changes in suprathreshold sound processing, others may be due to stimulus audibility and the elevated absolute thresholds associated with hearing loss. Masking noise can be used to raise the thresholds of NH to equal the thresholds in quiet of HI listeners. However, such noise may have other effects, including changing peripheral response characteristics, such as the compressive input-output function of the basilar membrane in the normal cochlea. This study estimated compression behaviorally across a range of background noise levels in NH listeners at a 4 kHz signal frequency, using a growth of forward masking paradigm. For signals 5 dB or more above threshold in noise, no significant effect of broadband noise level was found on estimates of compression. This finding suggests that broadband noise does not significantly alter the compressive response of the basilar membrane to sounds that are presented well above their threshold in the noise. Similarities between the performance of HI listeners and NH listeners in threshold-equalizing noise are therefore unlikely to be due to a linearization of basilar-membrane responses to suprathreshold stimuli in the NH listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21117751      PMCID: PMC2882661          DOI: 10.1121/1.3365311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Christopher J Plack; Ray Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age effects on discrimination of timing in auditory sequences.

Authors:  Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: neural correlates.

Authors:  D P Phillips
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The coding of intensity and the interaction of forward and backward masking.

Authors:  M J Penner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Off-frequency listening: effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking.

Authors:  B J O'Loughlin; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Vit Drga; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Nonadditivity of forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Adam Svec; Suyash N Joshi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression: additivity of forward masking in noise-masked normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.