Literature DB >> 22087921

Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Amy R Horwitz1, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno.   

Abstract

Compression in the basilar-membrane input-output response flattens the temporal envelope of a fluctuating signal when more gain is applied to lower level than higher level temporal components. As a result, level-dependent changes in gap detection for signals with different depths of envelope fluctuation and for subjects with normal and impaired hearing may reveal effects of compression. To test these assumptions, gap detection with and without a broadband noise was measured with 1, 000-Hz-wide (flatter) and 50-Hz-wide (fluctuating) noise markers as a function of marker level. As marker level increased, background level also increased, maintaining a fixed acoustic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to minimize sensation-level effects on gap detection. Significant level-dependent changes in gap detection were observed, consistent with effects of cochlear compression. For the flatter marker, gap detection that declines with increases in level up to mid levels and improves with further increases in level may be explained by an effective flattening of the temporal envelope at mid levels, where compression effects are expected to be strongest. A flatter effective temporal envelope corresponds to a reduced effective SNR. The effects of a reduction in compression (resulting in larger effective SNRs) may contribute to better-than-normal gap detection observed for some hearing-impaired listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087921      PMCID: PMC3248059          DOI: 10.1121/1.3643829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Gap detection in modulated noise: across-frequency facilitation and interference.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The relation between gap detection, loudness, and loudness growth in noise-masked normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Peninah S Rosengard; Andrew J Oxenham; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11

9.  A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Ana Alves-Pinto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Asymmetry of temporal processing in listeners with normal hearing and unilaterally deaf subjects.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Stella de Bode
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  15 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

4.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Sarah Drehobl; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

6.  Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chelsea Blankenship; Fawen Zhang; Robert Keith
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-24

8.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Gain on Gap-Detection Thresholds for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Emily Buss; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.

Authors:  Suzanne Carr Levy; Daniel J Freed; Michael Nilsson; Brian C J Moore; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Assessing musical abilities objectively: construction and validation of the profile of music perception skills.

Authors:  Lily N C Law; Marcel Zentner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.