Literature DB >> 21361443

Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Rohima Badri1, Jonathan H Siegel, Beverly A Wright.   

Abstract

Some individuals complain of hearing difficulties in the presence of background noise even in the absence of clinically significant hearing loss (obscure auditory dysfunction). Previous evidence suggests that these listeners have impaired frequency resolution, but there has been no thorough characterization of auditory filter shapes in this population. Here, the filter shapes of adults (n = 14) who self-reported speech recognition problems in noise and performed poorly on a sentence-in-noise perception test despite having clinically normal audiograms were compared to those of controls (n = 10). The filter shapes were evaluated using a 2-kHz probe with a fixed level of 30, 40, or 50 dB sound pressure level (SPL) and notched-noise simultaneous maskers that were varied in level to determine the masker level necessary to just mask the probe. The filters of the impaired group were significantly wider than those of controls at all probe levels owing to an unusual broadening of the upper slope of the filter. In addition, absolute thresholds were statistically indistinguishable between the groups at the standard audiometric frequencies, but were elevated in the impaired listeners at higher frequencies. These results strengthen the idea that this population has a variety of hearing deficits that go undetected by standard audiometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361443      PMCID: PMC3070989          DOI: 10.1121/1.3523476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  54 in total

1.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.

Authors:  B C Moore; D A Vickers; C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Elsa Del Rio; Ann R Bradlow; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Subcategories of patients with King-Kopetzky syndrome.

Authors:  F Zhao; D Stephens
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

4.  Auditory filter asymmetry at 2000 Hz in 80 normal-hearing ears.

Authors:  B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Growth of masking as a measure of response growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  P G Stelmachowicz; D E Lewis; L L Larson; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the growth of masking asymmetry with stimulus intensity.

Authors:  R A Lutfi; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.

Authors:  Richard J Baker; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.

Authors:  L A Werner; J Y Bargones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11

10.  High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-12
View more
  38 in total

1.  Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Horizontal directivity of low- and high-frequency energy in speech and singing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Eric J Hunter; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Primary Neural Degeneration in the Human Cochlea: Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss in the Aging Ear.

Authors:  P Z Wu; L D Liberman; K Bennett; V de Gruttola; J T O'Malley; M C Liberman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.