Literature DB >> 22501083

The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.

Virginia Best1, Nicole Marrone, Christine R Mason, Gerald Kidd.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that the reduction in spatial release from masking (SRM) resulting from sensorineural hearing loss in competing speech mixtures is influenced by the characteristics of the interfering speech. A frontal speech target was presented simultaneously with two intelligible or two time-reversed (unintelligible) speech maskers that were either colocated with the target or were symmetrically separated from the target in the horizontal plane. The difference in SRM between listeners with hearing impairment and listeners with normal hearing was substantially larger for the forward maskers (deficit of 5.8 dB) than for the reversed maskers (deficit of 1.6 dB). This was driven by the fact that all listeners, regardless of hearing abilities, performed similarly (and poorly) in the colocated condition with intelligible maskers. The same conditions were then tested in listeners with normal hearing using headphone stimuli that were degraded by noise vocoding. Reducing the number of available spectral channels systematically reduced the measured SRM, and again, more so for forward (reduction of 3.8 dB) than for reversed speech maskers (reduction of 1.8 dB). The results suggest that non-spatial factors can strongly influence both the magnitude of SRM and the apparent deficit in SRM for listeners with impaired hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22501083      PMCID: PMC3339507          DOI: 10.1121/1.3693656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masking effects of speech competing messages.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D R Bower
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1969-06

7.  Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons.

Authors:  A J Duquesnoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.

Authors:  Van Summers; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  27 in total

1.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Ann R Bradlow; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Application of a short-time version of the Equalization-Cancellation model to speech intelligibility experiments with speech maskers.

Authors:  Rui Wan; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The role of syntax in maintaining the integrity of streams of speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Christine R Mason; Timothy M Streeter; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Jörg M Buchholz; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spatial Release From Masking in Adults With Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Effects of Distracter Azimuth and Microphone Location.

Authors:  Timothy J Davis; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.