Literature DB >> 25234885

The role of syntax in maintaining the integrity of streams of speech.

Gerald Kidd1, Christine R Mason1, Virginia Best2.   

Abstract

This study examined the ability of listeners to utilize syntactic structure to extract a target stream of speech from among competing sounds. Target talkers were identified by voice or location, which was held constant throughout a test utterance, and paired with correct or incorrect (random word order) target sentence syntax. Both voice and location provided reliable cues for identifying target speech even when other features varied unpredictably. The target sentences were masked either by predominantly energetic maskers (noise bursts) or by predominantly informational maskers (similar speech in random word order). When the maskers were noise bursts, target sentence syntax had relatively minor effects on identification performance. However, when the maskers were other talkers, correct target sentence syntax resulted in significantly better speech identification performance than incorrect syntax. Furthermore, conformance to correct syntax alone was sufficient to accurately identify the target speech. The results were interpreted as supporting the idea that the predictability of the elements comprising streams of speech, as manifested by syntactic structure, is an important factor in binding words together into coherent streams. Furthermore, these findings suggest that predictability is particularly important for maintaining the coherence of an auditory stream over time under conditions high in informational masking.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234885      PMCID: PMC3986016          DOI: 10.1121/1.4861354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Tanya L Arbogast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evaluation of speech intelligibility with the coordinate response measure.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  Christopher J Darwin; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Aleksandra Hirst; Jan W de Fockert; Essi Viding
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

9.  Masking effects of speech competing messages.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D R Bower
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1969-06

10.  Swinging at a cocktail party: voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice.

Authors:  Ingrid S Johnsrude; Allison Mackey; Hélène Hakyemez; Elizabeth Alexander; Heather P Trang; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28
View more
  12 in total

1.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Schema vs. primitive perceptual grouping: the relative weighting of sequential vs. spatial cues during an auditory grouping task in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Does the semantic content or syntactic regularity of masker speech affect speech-on-speech recognition?

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Penelope Bencheck; Brandi Jett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Switching Streams Across Ears to Evaluate Informational Masking of Speech-on-Speech.

Authors:  Axelle Calcus; Tim Schoof; Stuart Rosen; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.

Authors:  Adrian Y Cho; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?

Authors:  Brandi Jett; Emily Buss; Virginia Best; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Kameron K Clayton; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of Hearing Loss and Cognitive Load on Speech Recognition with Competing Talkers.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Stefan Schreitmüller; Magdalene Ortmann; Sebastian Rählmann; Martin Walger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.