Literature DB >> 18404942

Classification of breast computed tomography data.

Thomas R Nelson1, Laura I Cerviño, John M Boone, Karen K Lindfors.   

Abstract

Differences in breast tissue composition are important determinants in assessing risk, identifying disease in images and following changes over time. This paper presents an algorithm for tissue classification that separates breast tissue into its three primary constituents of skin, fat and glandular tissue. We have designed and built a dedicated breast CT scanner. Fifty-five normal volunteers and patients with mammographically identified breast lesions were scanned. Breast CT voxel data were filtered using a 5 pt median filter and the image histogram was computed. A two compartment Gaussian fit of histogram data was used to provide an initial estimate of tissue compartments. After histogram analysis, data were input to region-growing algorithms and classified as to belonging to skin, fat or gland based on their value and architectural features. Once tissues were classified, a more detailed analysis of glandular tissue patterns and a more quantitative analysis of breast composition was made. Algorithm performance assessment demonstrated very good or excellent agreement between algorithm and radiologist observers in 97.7% of the segmented data. We observed that even in dense breasts the fraction of glandular tissue seldom exceeded 50%. For most individuals the composition is better characterized as being a 70% (fat)-30% (gland) composition than a 50% (fat)-50% (gland) composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404942      PMCID: PMC2706664          DOI: 10.1118/1.2839439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  40 in total

1.  Automatic segmentation of mammographic density.

Authors:  R Sivaramakrishna; N A Obuchowski; W A Chilcote; K A Powell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Segmentation algorithms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  I N Bankman; T Nizialek; I Simon; O B Gatewood; I N Weinberg; W R Brody
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  1997-06

3.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Nelson; K K Lindfors; J A Seibert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors.

Authors:  John J Heine; Poonam Malhotra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A constrained modulus reconstruction technique for breast cancer assessment.

Authors:  A Samani; J Bishop; D B Plewes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Karla M Kerlikowske; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Harry K Genant; Steve R Cummings
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computerized assessment of tissue composition on digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Yuan-Hsiang Chang; Xiao-Hui Wang; Lara A Hardesty; Thomas S Chang; William R Poller; Walter F Good; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Mammary gland architecture as a determining factor in the susceptibility of the human breast to cancer.

Authors:  J Russo; H Lynch; I H Russo
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 9.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences.

Authors:  John J Heine; Poonam Malhotra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Karen K Lindfors; John M Boone; Thomas R Nelson; Kai Yang; Alexander L C Kwan; DeWitt F Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  30 in total

1.  Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.

Authors:  David W Erickson; Jered R Wells; Gregory M Sturgeon; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; W Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Anthropomorphic breast phantoms with physiological water, lipid, and hemoglobin content for near-infrared spectral tomography.

Authors:  Kelly E Michaelsen; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Adele Shenoy; Emily Jordan; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Automatic Tissue Classification for High-resolution Breast CT Images Based on Bilateral Filtering.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Yang; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2011-03-14

6.  Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Travis Johnson; Muqing Lin; Huy Q Le; Justin L Ducote; Min-Ying Su; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography based on photon-counting detectors: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.